Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy

被引:74
作者
Romero, Ronald V. [1 ]
Mahadeva, Sanjiv [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaya, Fac Med, Dept Med, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY | 2013年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Risk factors; Quality;
D O I
10.4253/wjge.v5.i2.39
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Recent technological advances in colonoscopy have led to improvements in both image enhancement and procedural performance. However, the utility of these technological advancements remain dependent on the quality of bowel preparation during colonoscopy. Poor bowel preparation has been shown to be associated with lower quality indicators of colonoscopy performance, such as reduced cecal intubation rates, increased patient discomfort and lower adenoma detection. The most popular bowel preparation regimes currently used are based on either Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte, a non-absorbable solution, or aqueous sodium phosphate, a low-volume hyperosmotic solution. Statements from various international societies and several reviews have suggested that the efficacy of bowel preparation regimes based on both purgatives are similar, although patients' compliance with these regimes may differ somewhat. Many studies have now shown that factors other than the type of bowel preparation regime used, can influence the quality of bowel preparation among adult patients undergoing colonoscopy. These factors can be broadly categorized as either patient-related or procedure-related. Studies from both Asia and the West have identified patient-related factors such as an increased age, male gender, presence of co-morbidity and socioeconomic status of patients to be associated with poor bowel preparation among adults undergoing routine out-patient colonoscopy. Additionally, procedure-related factors such as adherence to bowel preparation instructions, timing of bowel purgative administration and appointment waiting times for colonoscopy are recognized to influence the quality of colon cleansing. Knowledge of these factors should aid clinicians in modifying bowel preparation regimes accordingly, such that the quality of colonoscopy performance and delivery of service to patients can be optimised. (C) 2013 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 46
页数:8
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] ADAMS WJ, 1994, DIS COLON RECTUM, V37, P229, DOI 10.1007/BF02048160
  • [2] Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12 134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3)
    Adler, Andreas
    Wegscheider, Karl
    Lieberman, David
    Aminalai, Alireza
    Aschenbeck, Jens
    Drossel, Rolf
    Mayr, Michael
    Mross, Michael
    Scheel, Mathias
    Schroeder, Andreas
    Gerber, Katharina
    Stange, Gabriela
    Roll, Stephanie
    Gauger, Ulrich
    Wiedenmann, Bertram
    Altenhofen, Lutz
    Rosch, Thomas
    [J]. GUT, 2013, 62 (02) : 236 - 241
  • [3] Allaire Jane, 2004, Gastroenterol Nurs, V27, P3, DOI 10.1097/00001610-200401000-00002
  • [4] A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda
    Aronchick, CA
    Lipshutz, WH
    Wright, SH
    Dufrayne, F
    Bergman, G
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (03) : 346 - 352
  • [5] Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: An analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital
    Aslinia, F
    Uradonlo, L
    Steele, A
    Greenwald, BD
    Raufman, JP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (04) : 721 - 731
  • [6] Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: Efficacy, tolerability and safety - A Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper
    Barkun, Alan
    Chiba, Naoki
    Enns, Robert
    Marcon, Margaret
    Natsheh, Susan
    PharmD, Co Pham
    Sadowski, Dan
    Vanner, Stephen
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 20 (11): : 699 - 710
  • [7] BATTLE WM, 1980, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V79, P1217
  • [8] Bertakis KD, 2000, J FAM PRACTICE, V49, P147
  • [9] Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy
    Bitoun, A.
    Ponchon, T.
    Barthet, M.
    Coffin, B.
    Dugue, C.
    Halphen, M.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 24 (11-12) : 1631 - 1642
  • [10] A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?
    Bowles, CJA
    Leicester, R
    Romaya, C
    Swarbrick, E
    Williams, CB
    Epstein, O
    [J]. GUT, 2004, 53 (02) : 277 - 283