DETERMINATION OF PROSTATE VOLUME BY TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND

被引:408
|
作者
TERRIS, MK
STAMEY, TA
机构
[1] Department of Urology, Stanford Univ. Med. Center, Stanford
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1991年 / 145卷 / 05期
关键词
ULTRASONOGRAPHY; PROSTATE;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38508-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Estimation of prostate gland volume with transrectal ultrasound may provide important information in the evaluation of benign and malignant prostatic diseases. To determine the most accurate means of volume estimation 150 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound with 15 separate methods of volume estimation. All patients underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy or cystoprostatectomy. Prostate specimen weights were compared with the results of each volume estimation method. Step-section planimetry, previously assumed to be the most accurate means of volume measurement, exhibited a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.93. The elliptical volume, widely used as an alternative to planimetry, demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.90. The most accurate method to estimate prostate weight (r = 0.94) was a variation of the prolate spheroid formula, expressed as pi/6 (transverse dimension) 2 (anteroposterior dimension). When different volume ranges were considered, this prolate spheroid formula provided the closest estimate of weight in glands of less than 40 gm. and those in the 40 to 80 gm. range. The most accurate method to estimate prostates weighing greater than 80 gm. was the formula pi/6 (transverse dimension) 3.
引用
收藏
页码:984 / 987
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer and determination of tumor volume, grade, and seminal vesicle invasion
    Norberg, M
    Holmberg, L
    Busch, C
    Haggman, M
    Egevad, L
    Magnusson, A
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1996, 6 (01) : 56 - 61
  • [42] Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: Is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance?
    Weiss, Brian E.
    Wein, Alan J.
    Malkowicz, S. Bruce
    Guzzo, Thomas J.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (08) : 1436 - 1440
  • [43] Determination of prostatic volume with transrectal ultrasound: A study of intra-observer and interobserver variation
    Bates, TS
    Reynard, JM
    Peters, TJ
    Gingell, JC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (04): : 1299 - 1300
  • [44] Is transrectal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging better at estimating prostatic volume for patients with prostate cancer?
    Sandberg, Maxwell
    Whitman, Wyatt
    Rong, Anita
    Davis, Ronald
    Hemal, Ashok
    Tsivian, Matvey
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41
  • [45] Prostate volume measurement by multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound: comparison with surgical specimen weight
    Martins, Tatiana
    Mussi, Thais Caldera
    Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
    EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO, 2020, 18 : eAO4662
  • [46] THE EFFICACY OF TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND AND PROSTATE-CANCER
    MANDELL, MJ
    HOPPER, KD
    JAROWENKO, MV
    ROHNER, TJ
    BELIS, JA
    STRYKER, JA
    MEILSTRUP, JW
    THIEME, GA
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, 1991, 32 (04) : 273 - 300
  • [47] TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND IN LOCAL HYPERTHERMIA TO THE BENIGN PROSTATE
    LEIB, Z
    LEV, A
    SERVADIO, C
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 9 (01) : 15 - 18
  • [48] Transrectal ultrasound microbubble contrast angiography of the prostate
    Ragde, H
    Kenny, GM
    Murphy, GP
    Landin, K
    PROSTATE, 1997, 32 (04): : 279 - 283
  • [49] PROSTATE BALLOON DILATATION MONITORED BY TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND
    SLOAN, JB
    UROLOGY, 1991, 38 (01) : 20 - 25
  • [50] TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND IN THE EVALUATION OF RHABDOMYOSARCOMA INVOLVING THE PROSTATE
    TERRIS, MK
    EIGNER, EB
    BRIGGS, EM
    REESE, JH
    TORTI, FM
    FREIHA, FS
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 74 (03): : 341 - 344