A Fuzzy Trade-Off Ranking Method for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making

被引：11

作者：

Jaini, Nor Izzati ^{[1
]}

Utyuzhnikov, Sergey V. ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Sackville St, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England

[2] Moscow Inst Phys & Technol, Dolgoprudnyi 141700, Russia

来源：

AXIOMS | 2018年 / 7卷 / 01期

关键词：

fuzzy trade-off; fuzzy TOPSIS; fuzzy VIKOR; ranking; multi-criteria decision-making; triangular fuzzy number; Pareto solution;

D O I：

10.3390/axioms7010001

中图分类号：

O29 [应用数学];

学科分类号：

070104 ;

摘要：

The aim of this paper is to present a trade-off ranking method in a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making environment. The triangular fuzzy numbers are used to represent the imprecise numerical quantities in the criteria values of each alternative and the weight of each criterion. A fuzzy trade-off ranking method is developed to rank alternatives in the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making problem with conflicting criteria. The trade-off ranking method tackles this type of multi-criteria problems by giving the least compromise solution as the best option. The proposed method for the fuzzy decision-making problems is compared against two other fuzzy decision-making approaches, fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and fuzzy VlseKriterijuska Optimizacija I Komoromisno Resenje (VIKOR), used for ranking alternatives.

引用

页数：21

共 70 条

[1] Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods [J].

Amiri, Morteza Pakdin .

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (09) :6218-6224

[2] Evaluating public risk preferences in forest land-use choices using multi-attribute utility theory [J].

Ananda, J ;

Herath, G .

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 55 (03) :408-419

[3] A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD - (THE PROMETHEE METHOD FOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING) [J].

BRANS, JP ;

VINCKE, PH .

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (06) :647-656

[4] A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry [J].

Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;

Cifci, Gizem .

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (03) :2341-2354

[5] Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology [J].

Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;

Cifci, Gizem ;

Guleryuz, Sezin .

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (08) :9407-9424

[6] A web-based decision support system for multi-criteria inventory classification using fuzzy AHP methodology [J].

Cakir, Ozan ;

Canbolat, Mustafa S. .

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2008, 35 (03) :1367-1378

[7] Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the Analytic Hierarchy Process [J].

Chatzimouraddis, Athanasios I. ;

Pilavachi, Petros A. .

ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (03) :778-787

[8] Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment [J].

Chen, CT .

FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) :1-9

[9] Asimple computation of MIN and MAX operations for fuzzy numbers [J].

Chiu, Chih-Hui ;

Wang, Wen-June .

FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2002, 126 (02) :273-276

[10] Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans, Boston, USA [J].

Contreras, Francisco ;

Hanaki, Keisuke ;

Aramaki, Toshiya ;

Connors, Stephen .

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2008, 52 (07) :979-991

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →