PLAIN ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY IN THE DETECTION OF MAJOR DISEASE IN CHILDREN - A PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

被引:26
作者
ROTHROCK, SG
GREEN, SM
HUMMEL, CB
机构
[1] Department of Emergency Medicine, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL
[2] Riverside General Hospital, Riverside, CA
[3] Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA
[4] Emergency Physicians Medical Group, Oakland, CA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0196-0644(05)80053-8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: To prospectively evaluate previously described high-yield clinical criteria for obtaining plain abdominal radiographs in the emergency evaluation of children. Design: Prospective, observational study. Setting: Emergency departments of a university medical center and an affiliated county hospital. Participants: Three hundred fifty-four children 15 years old or younger who underwent plain abdominal radiography during a one-year period. Methods and measurements: Physicians ordering plain abdominal radiographs completed data forms that included historical and physical examination information before viewing films. At a later date, records of all patients were reviewed for radiologist interpretation and final diagnosis. The data were analyzed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of previously described high-yield criteria (from a retrospective series) in detecting radiographs that were diagnostic or suggestive of "major" abdominal disease. Main results: Sixty-one patients (1 7%) had major diseases potentially requiring procedural intervention (eg, appendicitis, ingested foreign bodies, and intussusception), whereas 296 patients (83%) had minor diseases not requiring procedural intervention (eg, gastroenteritis and nonabdominal diagnoses). The presence of any of the following features-prior abdominal surgery, foreign body ingestion, abnormal bowel sounds, abdominal distention, or peritoneal signs-was 93% sensitive and 40% specific in detecting diagnostic or suggestive radiographs in patients with major disease. Positive and negative predictive values were 11% and 99%, respectively. If only these criteria had been used to obtain radiographs, 38% of films would have been omitted (at an estimated savings of $20,000) with only two suggestive radiographs missed. Conclusion: Our results suggest that restricting abdominal radiographs to patients with at least one of these five high-yield clinical features will detect most diagnostic and suggestive radiographs in children with major abdominal diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:1423 / 1429
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[31]  
Johnson, Woisard, Ileocotic intussusception: New sign on the supine cross table lateral radiograph, Radiology, 170, pp. 483-486, (1989)
[32]  
LeVine, Schwartz, Katz, Et al., Plain film findings in intussusception, Br J Radiol, 37, pp. 678-681, (1964)
[33]  
Riggs, Long, The value of the plain film roentgenogram in pyloric stenosis, Am J Roentgenol, 112, pp. 77-82, (1971)
[34]  
Schwerk, Wichtrup, Rothmund, Et al., Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: A prospective study, Gastroenterology, 97, pp. 630-639, (1989)
[35]  
Haller, Cohen, Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: Diagnosis using US, Radiology, 161, pp. 335-339, (1986)
[36]  
See, Glassman, Berezin, Et al., Emergency ultrasound in the evaluation of acute onset abdominal pain in children, Pediatr Emerg Care, 4, pp. 169-171, (1988)
[37]  
Rothrock, Goorhuis, Howard, Efficacy of plain abdominal radiography in patients with biliary tract disease, The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 8, pp. 271-275, (1989)