Visualizing Data to Support Judgement, Inference, and Decision Making in Learning Analytics: Insights from Cognitive Psychology and Visualization Science

被引:39
作者
Alhadad, Sakinah S. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Ctr Learning Futures, Nathan Campus, Brisbane, Qld 4122, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF LEARNING ANALYTICS | 2018年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
Data visualisation; attention; cognition; learning analytics; research methodology;
D O I
10.18608/jla.2018.52.5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Understanding human judgement and decision making during visual inspection of data is of both practical and theoretical interest. While visualizing data is a commonly employed mechanism to support complex cognitive processes such as inference, judgement, and decision making, the process of supporting and scaffolding cognition through effective design is less well understood. Applying insights from cognitive psychology and visualization science, this paper critically discusses the role of human factors - visual attention, perception, judgement, and decision making - toward informing methodological choices when visualizing data. The value of visualizing data is discussed in two key domains: 1) visualizing data as a means of communication; and 2) visualizing data as research methodology. The first applies cognitive science principles and research evidence to inform data visualization design for communication. The second applies data- and cognitive-science to deepen our understanding of data, of its uncertainty, and of analysis when making inferences. The evidence for human capacity limitations - attention and cognition - are discussed in the context of data visualizations to support inference-making in both domains, and are followed by recommendations. Finally, how learning analytics can further research on understanding the role data visualizations can play in supporting complex cognition is proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 85
页数:26
相关论文
共 142 条
[91]   Bar graphs depicting averages are perceptually misinterpreted: The within-the-bar bias [J].
Newman, George E. ;
Scholl, Brian J. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2012, 19 (04) :601-607
[92]   Confidence limits, error bars and method comparison in molecular modeling. Part 2: comparing methods [J].
Nicholls, A. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2016, 30 (02) :103-126
[93]   Redundant Encoding Strengthens Segmentation and Grouping in Visual Displays of Data [J].
Nothelfer, Christine ;
Gleicher, Michael ;
Franconeri, Steven .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2017, 43 (09) :1667-1676
[94]   Representing Error bars in within-subject designs in typical software packages [J].
O'Brien, Fearghal ;
Cousineau, Denis .
QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 10 (01) :56-67
[95]   How People with Low and High Graph Literacy Process Health Graphs: Evidence from Eye-tracking [J].
Okan, Yasmina ;
Galesic, Mirta ;
Garcia-Retamero, Rocio .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2016, 29 (2-3) :271-294
[96]   Visualizing data with bounded uncertainty [J].
Olston, C ;
Mackinlay, JD .
INFOVIS 2002: IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION VISUALIZATION 2002, 2002, :37-40
[97]   When One Shape Does Not Fit All: A Commentary Essay on the Use of Graphs in Psychological Research [J].
Pastore, Massimiliano ;
Lionetti, Francesca ;
Altoe, Gianmarco .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
[98]   Expert interpretation of bar and line graphs: the role of graphicacy in reducing the effect of graph format [J].
Peebles, David ;
Ali, Nadia .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
[99]   Confidence Intervals and the Within-the-Bar Bias [J].
Pentoney, Christopher S. ;
Berger, Dale E. .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2016, 70 (02) :215-220
[100]   Bottom-up and top-down attention are independent [J].
Pinto, Yair ;
van der Leij, Andries R. ;
Sligte, Ilja G. ;
Lamme, Victor A. F. ;
Scholte, H. Steven .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2013, 13 (03) :16