International Criminal Law as Global Law: An Assessment of the Hybrid Tribunals

被引：4
作者：
Holvoet, Mathias [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Hert, Paul [4 ,5 ]
机构：
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Inst European Studies, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Res Grp Fundamental Rights & Constitutionalism FR, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Global Governance Inst, Global Justice Sect, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Tilburg Inst Law & Technol, Law & Technol, Tilburg, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Brussel, Fac Law & Criminol, Brussels, Belgium
来源：
TILBURG LAW REVIEW-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW | 2012年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词：
hybrid tribunals; International Criminal Court; domestic tribunals; complementarity; impunity gap; fairness;
D O I：
10.1163/22112596-01702011
中图分类号：
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号：
0301 ;
摘要：
This contribution will focus on the facet of International Criminal Justice where the influence of global law is the most apparent, namely the hybrid or internationalized criminal tribunals. Since many of these tribunals have closed their doors or are in the advanced stage of the proceedings, the time is ripe for a preliminary evaluation. Furthermore, the future necessity and viability of hybrid tribunals will be assessed, both for crimes that fall within and without the jurisdictional regime established by the International Criminal Court (ICC).
引用
收藏
页码：228 / 240
页数：13
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Bernaz Nadia, 2010, PURSUIT INT CRIMINAL, V1, P312
  • [2] Boister N., 2003, EJIL, V14, P967
  • [3] Cadman Toby, INT CRIMES TRIBUNAL
  • [4] Charney Jonathan I., 2001, AM J INT LAW, V95, P120
  • [5] Cryer Robert, 2010, INTRO INT CRIMINAL L, P190
  • [6] de Bertodano Sylvia, 2007, JICJ, V5, P297
  • [7] Dicker Richard, 2012, NY TIMES
  • [8] Halling Matt, 2010, LEIDEN J INT LAW, V23, P843
  • [9] Haveman Roelof, 2003, SUPRANATIONAL CRIMIN, P5
  • [10] Heller Kevin Jon, 2012, OPINIO IURIS 0401
123