When, Where and How: The Use of Multidimensional Scaling Methods in the Study of Negotiation and Social Conflict

被引:21
作者
Pinkley, Robin L. [1 ]
Gelfand, Michele J. [2 ]
Duan, Lili [2 ]
机构
[1] Southern Methodist Univ, Edwin L Cox Sch Business, Amer Airlines Ctr Labor Relat & Conflict Resolut, Fincher Bldg,POB 750333, Dallas, TX 75275 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Psychol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL NEGOTIATION-A JOURNAL OF THEORY AND PRACTICE | 2005年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
Multidimensional scaling; statistical methods; multivariate techniques;
D O I
10.1163/1571806054741056
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
MDS (multidimensional scaling) is a technique that enables researchers to uncover the spatial representation or "hidden structure" that underlies and defines behavioral data - such as negotiator or disputant perceptions and preferences. Although MDS has wide-ranging theoretical and applied appeal, it has been highly underutilized in the conflict and negotiation literature. In this paper, we seek to illustrate the promise that MDS offers in the study of conflict and negotiation. We begin with a discussion of how MDS can be differentiated from other multivariate techniques, such as factor analysis. Next we provide a brief overview of multidimensional scaling techniques - highlighting the various methods available for collecting proximity data and the computer analysis programs that can be used to analyze them. We further review the nature of the results and the ways in which they are interpreted. We conclude with some examples of the types of questions that have been addressed using MDS in the conflict and negotiation literature and a discussion about the promise this technique has for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 96
页数:18
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   THE VEGETARIAN OPTION - VARIETIES, CONVERSIONS, MOTIVES AND CAREERS [J].
BEARDSWORTH, A ;
KEIL, T .
SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1992, 40 (02) :253-293
[2]  
Bernard H.R., 2013, SOCIAL RES METHODS Q
[3]  
BLACK JK, 1991, DEV THEORY PRACTICE
[4]  
Busing FMTA, 1997, SOFTSTAT 97 ADV STAT, V6, P67
[5]   THE SELECTION OF MEDIATION TACTICS IN PUBLIC-SECTOR DISPUTES - A CONTINGENCY ANALYSIS [J].
CARNEVALE, PJD ;
PEGNETTER, R .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1985, 41 (02) :65-81
[6]  
Carroll J.D., 1970, M PSYCH SOC STANF CA
[7]   Dimensions of international negotiation: A test of Ikle's typology [J].
Druckman, D ;
Martin, J ;
Nan, SA ;
Yagcioglu, D .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 1999, 8 (02) :89-108
[8]   Dimensions of international negotiations: Structures, processes, and outcomes [J].
Druckman, D .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 1997, 6 (05) :395-420
[9]  
Gelfand MJ, 1996, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V26, P397, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199605)26:3<397::AID-EJSP763>3.3.CO
[10]  
2-A