Humeral Head Posterior Subluxation on CT Scan: Validation and Comparison of 2 Methods of Measurement

被引:35
作者
Kidder, Jacob F. [1 ]
Rouleau, Dominique M. [2 ]
Pons-Villanueva, Juan [3 ]
Dynamidis, Savvas [4 ]
DeFranco, Michael J. [5 ]
Walch, Gilles [6 ]
机构
[1] Uni Hop Sacre Coeur Montreal, Orthopaed Grp, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Uni Hop Sacre Coeur Montreal, Dept Chirurg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Hosp Navarra, Orthoped Surg & Traumatol, Pamplona, Spain
[4] S Martino Hospital Navarra, Clin Ortoped, Genoa, Italy
[5] Lenox Hill Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Newark, NY 10075 USA
[6] Hop Prive Jean MERMOZ, Ctr Orthopaed Santy, Lyon, France
关键词
humeral head subluxation; measurements;
D O I
10.1097/BTE.0b013e3181e5d742
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Humeral static posterior translation is important for evaluation of osteoarthritis. Two different methods are compared for absolute difference and reliability. Methods: A group of patients with shoulder pathology were analyzed. Images were evaluated 2 times with 2 methods by 3 evaluators. The first method, scapula method (SM), uses the scapula axis as a reference line (line drawn from the medial border of the scapula body to the center of the glenoid). The second method, named mediatrice method (MM), used the ''mediatrice'' line, drawn as a perpendicular line to glenoid joint surface passing in its middle. The percentage of the humeral head posterior to the line was assessed at the longest AP diameter. A percentage higher than 55% defined posterior subluxation. Reliability of both methods was obtained using consistency and interobserver agreement using intraclass correlation. Results: One hundred fifteen cases met the inclusion criteria. The intraobserver reliability was very good using SM and good with MM. The interobserver reliability was very good for SM and good for MM. Conclusion: The SM is slightly more reliable for subluxation measurement of the glenohumeral joint, however, both could be used to study the influence of humeral head subluxation on postoperative results.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 76
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Neer I.I.C.S., Replacement arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 56, pp. 1-13, (1974)
  • [2] Gerber A., Ghalambor N., Warner J.J., Review article. Instability of shoulder arthroplasty: Balancing mobility and stability, Orthop Clin North Am, 32, pp. 661-670, (2001)
  • [3] Hennigan S.P., Iannotti J.P., Review article. Instability after prosthetic arthroplasty of the shoulder, Orthop Clin North Am, 32, pp. 649-659, (2001)
  • [4] Norris T.R., Iannotti J.P., Functional outcome after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: A multicenter study, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 11, pp. 130-135, (2002)
  • [5] Collins D., Tencer A., Sidles J., Et al., Edge displacement and deformation of glenoid components in response to eccentric loading. The effect of preparation of the glenoid bone, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 74, pp. 501-507, (1992)
  • [6] Boileau P., Krishnan S.G., Tinsi L., Et al., Tuberosity malposition and migration: Reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 11, pp. 401-412, (2002)
  • [7] Habermeyer P., Magosch P., Lichtenberg S., Recentering the humeral head for glenoid deficiency in total shoulder arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 457, pp. 124-132, (2006)
  • [8] Bigliani L.U., Weinstein D.M., Glasgow M.T., Et al., Glenohumeral arthroplasty for arthritis after instability surgery, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 4, pp. 87-94, (1995)
  • [9] Phipatanakul W.P., Norris T.R., Treatment of glenoid loosening and bone loss due to osteolysis with glenoid bone grafting, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 15, pp. 84-87, (2006)
  • [10] Clavert P., Millett P.J., Warner J.J., Glenoid resurfacing: What are the limits to asymmetric reaming for posterior erosion?, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 16, pp. 843-848, (2007)