Bio-Conjugated Polycaprolactone Membranes: A Novel Wound Dressing

被引:14
作者
Cai, Elijah Zhengyang [1 ]
Teo, Erin Yiling [2 ]
Jing, Lim [3 ]
Koh, Yun Pei [1 ]
Qian, Tan Si [4 ]
Wen, Feng [3 ]
Lee, James Wai Kit [1 ]
Hing, Eileen Chor Hoong [5 ,6 ]
Yap, Yan Lin [6 ]
Lee, Hanjing [6 ]
Lee, Chuen Neng [5 ,7 ]
Teoh, Swee-Hin [3 ]
Lim, Jane [5 ,6 ]
Lim, Thiam Chye [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Singapore, Singapore
[2] KK Womens & Children Hosp, Dept Reprod Med, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Chem & Biomed Engn, Divis Bioengn, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Fac Engn, Ctr Biomed Mat Applicat & Technol BIOMAT, Dept Mech Engn, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Surg, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Div Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Div Cardiac Thorac & Vasc Surg, Singapore, Singapore
来源
ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS | 2014年 / 41卷 / 06期
关键词
Skin; Wounds; Hyaluronic acid; Polycaprolactone; Rabbit;
D O I
10.5999/aps.2014.41.6.638
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The combination of polycaprolactone and hyaluronic acid creates an ideal environment for wound healing. Hyaluronic acid maintains a moist wound environment and accelerates the in-growth of granulation tissue. Polycaprolactone has excellent mechanical strength, limits inflammation and is biocompatible. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of bio-conjugated polycaprolactone membranes (BPM) as a wound dressing. Methods 16 New Zealand white rabbits were sedated and local anaesthesia was administered. Two 3.0x3.0 cm full-thickness wounds were created on the dorsum of each rabbit, between the lowest rib and the pelvic bone. The wounds were dressed with either BPM (n = 12) or Mepitel (n = 12) (control), a polyamide-silicon wound dressing. These were evaluated macroscopically on the 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th postoperative days for granulation, reepithelialization, infection, and wound size, and histologically for epidermal and dermal regeneration. Results Both groups showed a comparable extent of granulation and re-epithelialization. No signs of infection were observed. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in wound size between the two groups. BPM (n= 6): 8.33 cm(2), 4.90 cm(2), 3.12 cm(2), 1.84 cm(2); Mepitel (n = 6): 10.29 cm(2), 5.53 cm(2), 3.63 cm(2), 2.02 cm(2); at the 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th postoperative days. The extents of epidermal and dermal regeneration were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions BPM is comparable to Mepitel as a safe and efficacious wound dressing.
引用
收藏
页码:638 / 646
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   A randomised controlled pilot study comparing Mepitel® and SurfaSoft® on paediatric donor sites treated with Recell® [J].
Campanella, S. D. ;
Rapley, P. ;
Ramelet, A. -S. .
BURNS, 2011, 37 (08) :1334-1342
[2]  
Campbell B. G., 2004, Small animal and exotics. Book two: Pain management - zoonosis. Proceedings of the North American Veterinary Conference, Volume 18, Orlando, Florida, USA, 17-21 January 2004, P1217
[3]   Functions of hyaluronan in wound repair [J].
Chen, WYJ ;
Abatangelo, G .
WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 1999, 7 (02) :79-89
[4]   Microbial hyaluronic acid production [J].
Chong, BF ;
Blank, LM ;
Mclaughlin, R ;
Nielsen, LK .
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2005, 66 (04) :341-351
[5]   Development of cell-selective films for layered co-culturing of vascular progenitor cells [J].
Chong, Mark S. K. ;
Chan, Jerry ;
Choolani, Mahesh ;
Lee, Chuen-Neng ;
Teoh, Swee-Hin .
BIOMATERIALS, 2009, 30 (12) :2241-2251
[6]  
Deved M, 1999, ANN BURNS FIRE DISAS, V12, P103
[7]  
Ford D A, 2001, AORN J, V73, P446, DOI 10.1016/S0001-2092(06)61983-2
[8]   Pexiganan-incorporated collagen matrices for infected wound-healing processes in rat [J].
Gopinath, D ;
Kumar, MS ;
Selvaraj, D ;
Jayakumar, R .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A, 2005, 73A (03) :320-331
[9]  
Hanna J R, 1997, J Foot Ankle Surg, V36, P2
[10]   Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage [J].
Hutmacher, DW .
BIOMATERIALS, 2000, 21 (24) :2529-2543