A transnational comparison of service-learning as a tool for leadership development

被引:3
作者
Cress, Christine M. [1 ]
Yamashita, Miki [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Duarte, Rebecca [1 ]
Burns, Heather [1 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] JF Oberlin Univ, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Reitaku Univ, Chiba, Japan
关键词
Service levels; Leadership development; Citizen participation; Learning methods; Educational planning and administration; United States of America;
D O I
10.1108/19348831011046281
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - This investigation sought to identify learning outcomes for undergraduate students at a US college enrolled in community-based learning courses. Specifically, the purpose of this paper is to examine the similarities and differences between American students' and international students' development of leadership skills through senior level service-learning (SL) courses and analyzed the role of teaching methods on those outcomes. Design/methodology/approach - Over 150 SL courses from students representing 30 countries were examined at a major university in the USA. US and non-US student leadership and learning outcomes were cross-tabulated with instructional techniques to analyze for statistically significant differences. Findings - Facilitating leadership skill development is a function of utilizing transformational rather than traditional classroom teaching techniques. Practical implications - Transformational teaching and learning methods such as collaborative projects, student-selected readings, and group decision-making in SL courses help transform students' views of themselves, their communities, and the world as they consider their roles as leaders in an unscripted future. Originality/value - Few studies have examined the instructional elements in SL that transform student knowledge and leadership skills especially across such a breadth and variety of SL courses and student cultural backgrounds.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / +
页数:18
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, STRANGERS DIFFERENT
[2]  
Appiah KA, 2006, COSMOPOLITANISM ETHN
[3]  
Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2002, GREAT EXP NEW VIS LE
[4]  
Astin A.W., 2000, LEADERSHIP RECONSIDE
[5]  
Astin AW, 1999, REV HIGH EDUC, V22, P187
[6]   Diversity, Group Identity, and Citizenship Education in a Global Age [J].
Banks, James A. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2008, 37 (03) :129-139
[7]  
Battistoni R.M., 1997, ED CITIZENSHIP IDEAS, P31
[8]  
Berger J. B., 2002, NASPA J, V40, P85
[9]  
Bowden J., 1998, U LEARNING QUALITY C
[10]  
Bowen H.R., 1977, INVESTMENT LEARNING