One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis

被引:53
作者
Sachs, Donald [1 ]
Capobianco, Robyn [2 ]
Cher, Daniel [2 ]
Holt, Timothy [3 ]
Gundanna, Mukund [4 ]
Graven, Timothy [5 ]
Shamie, A. Nick [6 ]
Cummings, John, Jr. [7 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Spinal Stenosis & Neurol Care, Lakeland, FL USA
[2] SI BONE Inc, Suite 2200,3055 Olin Ave, San Jose, CA 95124 USA
[3] Montgomery Spine Ctr, Montgomery, AL USA
[4] Brazos Spine, College Stn, TX USA
[5] SSM Orthoped, Wentzville, MO USA
[6] UCLA Spine Ctr, Santa Monica, CA USA
[7] Community Neurosurg Care, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
minimally invasive surgery; sacroiliac joint; SI joint fusion; arthrodesis; previous spine surgery;
D O I
10.2147/MDER.S56491
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: Sacroiliac joint (SI) pain is an often-overlooked cause of lower-back pain, due in part to a lack of specific findings on radiographs and a symptom profile similar to other back-related disorders. A minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach to SI joint fusion using a series of triangular, titanium plasma spray-coated implants has shown favorable outcomes in patients with SI joint pain refractory to conservative care. The aim of this study was to provide a multicenter experience of MIS SI joint fusion using a patient-level analysis. Patients and methods: We report a patient-level analysis from 144 patients with a mean of 16 months postoperative follow-up. Demographic information, perioperative measures, complications, and clinical outcomes using a visual analog scale for pain were collected prospectively. Random-effects regression models were used to account for intersite variability. Results: The mean age was 58 years, 71% of patients were female, and 62% had a history of lumbar spinal fusion. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) operative time was 73 minutes (25.4-118), blood loss was minimal, and hospital stay was 0.8 days (0.1-1.5). At follow-up, mean (95% CI) visual analog scale pain scores improved by 6.1 points (5.7-6.6). Substantial clinical benefit, defined as a decrease in pain by >2.5 points or a score of 3.5 or less, was achieved in 91.9% of patients (95% CI 83.9%-96.1%), and 96% (95% CI 86.3%-98.8%) of patients indicated they would have the same surgery again. Conclusion: When conservative measures fail to relieve symptoms resulting from degeneration or disruption of the SI joint, MIS SI joint fusion using a series of triangular, porous, titanium plasma spray-coated implants is a safe and effective treatment option.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 304
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Nonoperative care to manage sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis: high costs and medical resource utilization in the United States Medicare population Clinical article [J].
Ackerman, Stacey J. ;
Polly, David W., Jr. ;
Knight, Tyler ;
Holt, Tim ;
Cummings, John, Jr. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 20 (04) :354-363
[2]   Comparison of the costs of nonoperative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a United States Medicare population: potential economic implications of a new minimally-invasive technology [J].
Ackerman, Stacey J. ;
Polly, David W., Jr. ;
Knight, Tyler ;
Schneider, Karen ;
Holt, Tim ;
Cummings, John .
CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2013, 5 :575-587
[3]   RECOGNIZING SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS OF NONSPECIFIC LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
BERNARD, TN ;
KIRKALDYWILLIS, WH .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1987, (217) :266-280
[4]  
Broadhurst NA, 1998, J SPINAL DISORD, V11, P341
[5]   Sacroiliac joint pain: burden of disease [J].
Cher, Daniel ;
Polly, David ;
Berven, Sigurd .
MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (01) :73-81
[6]   Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales [J].
Copay, Anne G. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Subach, Brian R. ;
Berven, Sigurd ;
Schuler, Thomas C. ;
Carreon, Leah Y. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (06) :968-974
[7]   Sacroiliac joint bridging: Demographical and anatomical aspects [J].
Dar, G ;
Peleg, S ;
Masharawi, Y ;
Steinberg, N ;
Rothschild, BM ;
Peled, N ;
Hershkovitz, I .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (15) :E429-E432
[8]   Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study [J].
Duhon, Bradley S. ;
Cher, Daniel J. d ;
Wine, Kathryn D. ;
Lockstadt, Harry ;
Kovalsky, Don ;
Soo, Cheng-Lun .
MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2013, 6 (01) :219-229
[9]   Sacroiliac joint pain - Anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment [J].
Foley, Brian S. ;
Buschbacher, Ralph M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2006, 85 (12) :997-1006
[10]   Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis [J].
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Copay, Anne G. ;
Berven, Sigurd H. ;
Polly, David W. ;
Subach, Brian R. ;
Carreon, Leah Y. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (09) :1839-1847