ITEM DIFFICULTY OF 4 VERBAL ITEM TYPES AND AN INDEX OF DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING FOR BLACK-AND-WHITE EXAMINEES

被引:15
作者
FREEDLE, R
KOSTIN, I
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-3984.1990.tb00752.x
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
In this study, the authors explored the importance of item difficulty (equated delta) as a predictor of differential item functioning (DIF) of Black versus matched White examinees for four verbal item types (analogies, antonyms, sentence completions, reading comprehension) using 13 GRE‐disclosed forms (988 verbal items) and 11 SAT‐disclosed forms (935 verbal items). The average correlation across test forms for each item type (and often the correlation for each individual test form as well) revealed a significant relationship between item difficulty and DIF value for both GRE and SAT. The most important finding indicates that for hard items, Black examinees perform differentially better than matched ability White examinees for each of the four item types and for both the GRE and SAT tests! The results further suggest that the amount of verbal context is an important determinant of the magnitude of the relationship between item difficulty and differential performance of Black versus matched White examinees. Several hypotheses accounting for this result were explored. Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 343
页数:15
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BLEISTEIN CA, 1987, DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FU
[2]  
DORANS N, 1983, RR839 ED TEST SERV R
[3]  
DORANS N, 1982, SR8290 STAT REP
[4]   DEMONSTRATING THE UTILITY OF THE STANDARDIZATION APPROACH TO ASSESSING UNEXPECTED DIFFERENTIAL ITEM PERFORMANCE ON THE SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE-TEST [J].
DORANS, NJ ;
KULICK, E .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1986, 23 (04) :355-368
[5]  
FREEDLE R, 1987, 8738 ED TEST SERV RR
[6]  
FREEDLE R, 1988, 8829 ED TEST SERV RE
[7]  
Freedle R., 1987, SEMANTIC STRUCTURAL
[8]  
HOLLAND PH, 1986, APR ANN M AM ED RES
[9]  
LORD FM, 1980, APPLICATIONS ITEM RE
[10]  
MANTEL N, 1959, J NATL CANCER I, V22, P719