ANIMALS PREDISPOSED TO DEVELOP AMPHETAMINE SELF-ADMINISTRATION SHOW HIGHER SUSCEPTIBILITY TO DEVELOP CONTEXTUAL CONDITIONING OF BOTH AMPHETAMINE-INDUCED HYPERLOCOMOTION AND SENSITIZATION

被引:60
作者
JODOGNE, C [1 ]
MARINELLI, M [1 ]
LEMOAL, M [1 ]
PIAZZA, PV [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV BORDEAUX 2, INSERM, U259, PSYCHOBIOL COMPORTEMENTS ADAPTATIFS LAB, F-33077 BORDEAUX, FRANCE
关键词
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCE; CONDITIONING; AMPHETAMINE-INDUCED HYPERLOCOMOTION; SENSITIZATION; DRUG ABUSE; AMPHETAMINE; LOCOMOTION;
D O I
10.1016/0006-8993(94)90973-3
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
It has been shown that rats, like humans, display individual differences in the propensity to develop psychostimulant self-administration. Animals showing the highest locomotor reactivity to novelty (HRs: High Responders) are more prone to develop amphetamine self-administration than rats having a low locomotor response to novelty (LRs: Low Responders). The present study was designed to ascertain whether individual differences are also present in the conditioning of drug effects, a process involved in the maintenance of addiction. After pairing the drug effect with a particular set of environmental cues, only HRs showed conditioned hyperlocomotion and environment-specific sensitization to the effect of amphetamine. Unconditioned sensitization was, however, observed in LRs but not in HRs. The environment-specific sensitization disappeared on extinction of the conditioned hyperlocomotion in HRs, indicating that conditioning facilitates the expression of sensitization. In contrast, an inhibitory influence of conditioning on sensitization emerged from the analysis of the same results over all the experimental groups, without taking individual differences into account. In conclusion, our results shaw that: (i) locomotor reactivity to novelty predicts both vulnerability to develop self-administration and contextual conditioning of drug effects, which suggests that the two phenomena are two related features and that conditioning plays an important role not only in the maintenance of drug intake but also in its development; (ii) conditioned and unconditioned sensitization can be developed separately in different individuals which suggests that they are independent phenomena; (iii) analysis of individual differences is relevant to pharmacological studies, especially with respect to drugs of abuse.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 244
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]   FACTORS THAT PREDICT INDIVIDUAL VULNERABILITY TO AMPHETAMINE SELF-ADMINISTRATION [J].
PIAZZA, PV ;
DEMINIERE, JM ;
LEMOAL, M ;
SIMON, H .
SCIENCE, 1989, 245 (4925) :1511-1513
[22]   EFFECTS OF CS-US INTERVAL ON CONDITIONING OF DRUG RESPONSE WITH ASSESSMENT OF SPEED OF CONDITIONING [J].
PICKENS, RW ;
CROWDER, WF .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIA, 1967, 11 (01) :88-88
[23]   COCAINE-INDUCED BEHAVIORAL SENSITIZATION AND KINDLING - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EMERGENCE OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND SEIZURES [J].
POST, RM ;
WEISS, SRB ;
PERT, A .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1988, 537 :292-308
[24]   THE NEURAL BASIS OF DRUG CRAVING - AN INCENTIVE-SENSITIZATION THEORY OF ADDICTION [J].
ROBINSON, TE ;
BERRIDGE, KC .
BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 1993, 18 (03) :247-291
[25]   ENDURING CHANGES IN BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR PRODUCED BY CHRONIC AMPHETAMINE ADMINISTRATION - A REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF ANIMAL-MODELS OF AMPHETAMINE PSYCHOSIS [J].
ROBINSON, TE ;
BECKER, JB .
BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 1986, 11 (02) :157-198
[26]  
SIEGEL S, 1979, PSYCHOPATHOLOGY ANIM, P143
[27]   DEVELOPMENT OF BOTH CONDITIONING AND SENSITIZATION OF THE BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATING EFFECTS OF AMPHETAMINE IS BLOCKED BY THE NONCOMPETITIVE NMDA RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST, MK-801 [J].
STEWART, J ;
DRUHAN, JP .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 110 (1-2) :125-132
[28]  
STEWART J, 1991, BEHAV PHARMACOL, V2, P65
[29]   ROLE OF UNCONDITIONED AND CONDITIONED DRUG EFFECTS IN THE SELF-ADMINISTRATION OF OPIATES AND STIMULANTS [J].
STEWART, J ;
DEWIT, H ;
EIKELBOOM, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1984, 91 (02) :251-268
[30]  
TILSON HA, 1973, PHARM BIO B, V1, P149