POLLEN DIMORPHISM IN 3 TEUCRIUM SPECIES (LAMIACEAE)

被引:8
作者
OJEDA, F
DIEZ, MJ
机构
[1] Dpto. Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Sevilla, E-41080
关键词
LAMIACEAE; TEUCRIUM; POLLEN DIMORPHISM; GYNODIOECY; MALE STERILITY; VIABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/BF00937734
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
In the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands pollen dimorphism was found in Teucrium fruticans L., T. pseudochamaepitys L., and T. rotundifolium SCHREBER. Generally, this dimorphism shows two sizes of pollen grains, the smaller more or less collapsed. The percentage of pollen viability is calculated. Differences in size between viable and nonviable pollen grains are similar, being about 40% in T. fruticans and T. pseudochamaepitys, and about 26% in T. rotundifolium. With regard to pollen viability, the percentage of male sterility is higher in T. fruticans, in which from male sterile (ms) plants, 100% nonviable pollen was obtained from every flower observed. In T. pseudochamaepitys and T. rotundifolium with rare exceptions, the percentage of nonviable pollen does not seem to be significant.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BELHASSEN E, 1990, CR ACAD SCI III-VIE, V310, P371
[2]   AN EXAMPLE OF NONEQUILIBRIUM PROCESSES - GYNODIOECY OF THYMUS-VULGARIS L IN BURNED HABITATS [J].
BELHASSEN, E ;
TRABAUD, L ;
COUVET, D ;
GOUYON, PH .
EVOLUTION, 1989, 43 (03) :662-667
[3]  
BELHASSEN E, 1986, FLUX GENIQUES PERTUR
[4]  
DIEZ MJ, 1991, IN PRESS LAGASCALIA, V17
[5]   NATURAL-SELECTION AND GYNODIOECY IN THYMUS-VULGARIS L [J].
DOMMEE, B ;
ASSOUAD, MW ;
VALDEYRON, G .
BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1978, 77 (01) :17-28
[6]  
ERDTMAN G, 1960, SVENSK BOT TIDSKR, V39, P187
[7]  
GARCIAMONTOYA F, 1988, LAGASCALIA S, V15, P691
[8]  
GOUYON PH, 1980, ACTA OECOL-OEC PLANT, V1, P165
[9]   EVOLUTION OF DIOECISM IN LEPECHINIA WILLD SECT PARVIFLORAE (LAMIACEAE) [J].
HART, JA .
SYSTEMATIC BOTANY, 1985, 10 (02) :147-154
[10]   CYTOCHEMICAL REDUCTION OF NITRO BLUE TETRAZOLIUM AS INDEX OF POLLEN VIABILITY [J].
HAUSER, EJP ;
MORRISON, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1964, 51 (07) :748-&