Translational governance research for synthetic biology

被引:2
作者
Kuzma, Jennifer [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Genet Engn & Soc Ctr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] North Carolina State Univ, Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ELSI; policy; translation; governance; technology; synthetic biology;
D O I
10.1080/23299460.2014.1002055
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article argues that ethical, legal, and societal implications research on synthetic biology should inform the processes and methods for the design and implementation of governance systems, as well as the policy and technological choices made within them. Historically, this type of work has fallen in the gap between practical policy-making and basic social science or humanities research. Little of it has been funded, yet it is one of the most critical areas for scholarly contributions to how technologies are formed and overseen in society. In this article, key areas for 'translational governance research' are proposed alongside foundations for integrating its results and methods into decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 112
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Bennett I, 2006, SCI CULTURE, V15, P309, DOI DOI 10.1080/09505430601022635
[2]   The engineer's approach to biology [J].
Breithaupt, H .
EMBO REPORTS, 2006, 7 (01) :21-24
[3]   Synthetic biology: constructing nature? [J].
Calvert, Jane .
SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2010, 58 :95-112
[4]  
Cook-Deegan R., 1994, GENE WARS SCI POLITI
[5]   Foundations for engineering biology [J].
Endy, D .
NATURE, 2005, 438 (7067) :449-453
[6]  
Erik F, 2006, SCI PUBL POLICY, V33, P5
[7]   Lessons learned from the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications program (ELSI): Planning societal implications research for the National Nanotechnology Program [J].
Fisher, Erik .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2005, 27 (03) :321-328
[8]  
Guston DH., 2002, TECHNOL SOC, V24, P93, DOI [10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1, DOI 10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1]
[9]   Unpackaging synthetic biology: Identification of oversight policy problems and options [J].
Kuzma, Jennifer ;
Tanji, Todd .
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2010, 4 (01) :92-112
[10]   Opening up and "Closing down" - Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology [J].
Stirling, Andy .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2008, 33 (02) :262-294