Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy

被引:32
作者
Ludman, Sian W. [1 ]
Boyle, Robert J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Paediat Allergy Dept, St Marys Hosp, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Dept Paediat, London, England
关键词
anaphylaxis; quality of life;
D O I
10.2147/JAA.S62288
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Systemic allergic reactions to insect stings affect up to 5% of the population during their lifetime, and up to 32% of beekeepers. Such reactions can be fatal, albeit very rarely, and fear of a further systemic reaction (SR) can lead to significant anxiety and quality of life impairment. A recent Cochrane systematic review confirmed that venom immunotherapy (VIT) is an effective treatment for people who have had a systemic allergic reaction to an insect sting. VIT reduces risk of a further SR (relative risk 0.10, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.28), but VIT also reduces risk of a future large local reaction, and significantly improves disease-specific quality of life. However, health economic analysis showed that VIT is generally not cost effective for preventing future SRs; most people are stung infrequently, most SRs resolve without long-term consequences, and a fatal outcome is extremely rare. VIT only becomes cost effective if one is stung frequently (eg, beekeepers) or if quality of life improvement is considered. Thus, for most people with insect sting allergy, anxiety and quality of life impairment should be the overriding consideration when making treatment decisions, highlighting the importance of a patient-centered approach. Areas which need to be explored in future research include efforts to improve the safety and convenience of VIT such as the use of sublingual immunotherapy; quality of life effects of venom allergy in children and adolescents as well as their parents; and the optimal duration of treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 86
页数:12
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Adler A., 2012, PHARMALGEN TREATMENT
[2]   Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy [J].
Akdis, Muebeccel ;
Akdis, Cezmi A. .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2007, 119 (04) :780-789
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, PROD CAT 2012 IMM IS
[4]   Venom Immunotherapy: an Updated Review [J].
Antolin-Amerigo, Dario ;
Moreno Aguilar, Carmen ;
Vega, Arantza ;
Alvarez-Mon, Melchor .
CURRENT ALLERGY AND ASTHMA REPORTS, 2014, 14 (07)
[5]   The HIT study: Hymenoptera Identification Test-how accurate are people at identifying stinging insects? [J].
Baker, Troy W. ;
Forester, Joseph P. ;
Johnson, Monica L. ;
Stolfi, Adrienne ;
Stahl, Mark C. .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 113 (03) :267-270
[6]   REDUCTION OF SIDE-EFFECTS FROM RUSH-IMMUNOTHERAPY WITH HONEY-BEE VENOM BY PRETREATMENT WITH TERFENADINE [J].
BERCHTOLD, E ;
MAIBACH, R ;
MULLER, U .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1992, 22 (01) :59-65
[7]   Diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy [J].
Biló, BM ;
Rueff, F ;
Mosbech, H ;
Bonifazi, F ;
Oude-Elberink, JNG .
ALLERGY, 2005, 60 (11) :1339-1349
[8]   Anaphylaxis caused by Hymenoptera stings: from epidemiology to treatment [J].
Bilo, M. B. .
ALLERGY, 2011, 66 :35-37
[9]   RAPID HYMENOPTERA VENOM IMMUNOTHERAPY - COMPARATIVE SAFETY OF 3 PROTOCOLS [J].
BIRNBAUM, J ;
CHARPIN, D ;
VERVLOET, D .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1993, 23 (03) :226-230
[10]   The role of basophil activation test in special populations with mastocytosis and reactions to hymenoptera sting [J].
Bonadonna, P. ;
Zanotti, R. ;
Melioli, G. ;
Antonini, F. ;
Romano, I. ;
Lenzi, L. ;
Caruso, B. ;
Passalacqua, G. .
ALLERGY, 2012, 67 (07) :962-965