RESPONSE STRATEGIES WHEN FAKING PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRES IN A VOCATIONAL SELECTION SETTING

被引:34
作者
MAHAR, D [1 ]
COLOGON, J [1 ]
DUCK, J [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV QUEENSLAND,DIV PSYCHOL,ST LUCIA,QLD 4072,AUSTRALIA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0191-8869(94)00200-C
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This research investigated whether respondents rely on their stereotype of members of a particular occupation when attempting to fake personality questionnaires to gain employment in that occupation. The subject's test profiles when attempting to fake the MBTI to gain employment as psychiatric nurses were compared to those of actual psychiatric nurses as well as with the subjects' profiles under either the normal administration protocol, instructions to complete the test to give the best general impression of themselves, or instructions to describe a typical psychiatric nurse via their test responses. Although the subjects failed to imitate the profiles of psychiatric nurses, their responses were highly sensitive to these instructional manipulations. The data suggested that subjects' faking strategy is based on their stereotype of members of the target occupation. Although there was a significant difference between the subjects' fake-job and stereotype profiles, these two conditions yielded identical typologies. In addition, the Euclidean distance between these two profiles was significantly less than that between the fake-job profiles and those obtained in any other condition.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 609
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
DEVITO AJ, 1985, 9TH MENTAL MEASUREME, V1, P1030
[2]   RESPONSE BIAS, SOCIAL DESIRABILITY AND DISSIMULATION [J].
FURNHAM, A .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1986, 7 (03) :385-400
[3]   FAKING PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRES - FABRICATING DIFFERENT PROFILES FOR DIFFERENT PURPOSES [J].
FURNHAM, A .
CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH & REVIEWS, 1990, 9 (01) :46-55
[4]   THE FAKEABILITY OF THE 16-PF, MYERS-BRIGGS AND FIRO-B PERSONALITY MEASURES [J].
FURNHAM, A .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1990, 11 (07) :711-716
[5]  
Jung C. G., 1923, PSYCHOL TYPES
[6]   INVALIDITY OF VALIDITY SCALES - CASE OF MMPI [J].
KROGER, RO ;
TURNBULL, W .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 43 (01) :48-55
[7]  
LEVY N, 1972, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V31, P641
[8]  
Myers I.B., 1985, MANUAL GUIDE DEV USE
[9]   MANAGEMENT SELECTION IN BRITAIN - A SURVEY AND CRITIQUE [J].
ROBERTSON, IT ;
MAKIN, PJ .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 59 (01) :45-57
[10]   SOME CORRELATES OF A JUNGIAN PERSONALITY-INVENTORY [J].
STRICKER, LJ ;
ROSS, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1964, 14 (02) :623-643