Pediatric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Predicting successful outcomes

被引:26
作者
McAdams, Sean [1 ]
Shukla, Aseem R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Med Ctr & Amplatz Childrens Hosp, Dept Urol Surg, 420 Delaware St SE ,Mayo Mail Code 394, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Attenuation value; pediatric kidney stone; safety; skin to stone distance; shockwave lithotripsy;
D O I
10.4103/0970-1591.74457
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is currently a first-line procedure of most upper urinary tract stones < 2 cm of size because of established success rates, its minimal invasiveness and long-term safety with minimal complications. Given that alternative surgical and endourological options exist for the management of stone disease and that ESWL failure often results in the need for repeat ESWL or secondary procedures, it is highly desirable to identify variables predicting successful outcomes of ESWL in the pediatric population. Despite numerous reports and growing experience, few prospective studies and guidelines for pediatric ESWL have been completed. Variation in the methods by which study parameters are measured and reported can make it difficult to compare individual studies or make definitive recommendations. There is ongoing work and a need for continuing improvement of imaging protocols in children with renal colic, with a current focus on minimizing exposure to ionizing radiation, perhaps utilizing advancements in ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. This report provides a review of the current literature evaluating the patient attributes and stone factors that may be predictive of successful ESWL outcomes along with reviewing the role of pre-operative imaging and considerations for patient safety.
引用
收藏
页码:544 / 548
页数:5
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
ACKERMANN DK, 1994, EUR UROL, V25, P105
[2]   Outcome of small residual stone fragments following shock wave lithotripsy in children [J].
Afshar, K ;
McLorie, G ;
Papanikolaou, F ;
Malek, R ;
Harvey, E ;
Pippi-Salle, JL ;
Bagli, DJ ;
Khoury, AE ;
Farhat, W .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (04) :1600-1603
[3]   Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children:: experience using a mpl-9000 lithotriptor [J].
Aksoy, Y ;
Özbey, I ;
Atmaca, AF ;
Polat, Ö .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 22 (02) :115-119
[4]   Does size and site matter for renal stones up to 30-mm in size in children treated by extracorporeal lithotripsy? [J].
Ather, MH ;
Noor, MA .
UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (01) :212-215
[5]   Renal Stone Assessment with Dual-Energy Multidetector CT and Advanced Postprocessing Techniques: Improved Characterization of Renal Stone Composition-Pilot Study [J].
Boll, Daniel T. ;
Patil, Neil A. ;
Paulson, Erik K. ;
Merkle, Elmar M. ;
Simmons, W. Neal ;
Pierre, Sean A. ;
Preminger, Glenn M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 250 (03) :813-820
[6]   Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure [J].
Brenner, David J. ;
Hall, Eric J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) :2277-2284
[7]   Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pediatrics [J].
D'Addessi, Alessandro ;
Bongiovanni, Luca ;
Sasso, Francesco ;
Gulino, Gaetano ;
Falabella, Roberto ;
Bassi, Pierfrancesco .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (01) :1-11
[8]   Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower caliceal stones in children compared with stones in other renal locations [J].
Demirkesen, O ;
Önal, B ;
Tansu, N ;
Altintas, R ;
Yalçin, V ;
Öner, A .
UROLOGY, 2006, 67 (01) :170-174
[9]   Is the pediatric ureter as efficient as the adult ureter in transporting fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi larger than 10 mm.? [J].
Gofrit, ON ;
Pode, D ;
Meretyk, S ;
Katz, G ;
Shapiro, A ;
Golijanin, D ;
Wiener, DP ;
Shenfeld, OZ ;
Landau, EH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (05) :1862-1864
[10]  
Gurocak S, 2009, J PEDIAT UROL, V5, pS35