Selecting indicators for international benchmarking of radiotherapy centres

被引:9
作者
van Lent, W. A. M. [1 ,4 ]
de Beer, R. D. [2 ]
van Triest, B. [3 ]
van Harten, W. H. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Psychosocial Res & Epidemiol, POB 90203, NL-1006 BE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Minist Hlth Welf & Sport, The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Radiotherapy Dept, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Twente, Sch Management & Governance, Dept Hlth Technol Serv Res, Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Benchmarking; indicators; operations management; quality management; radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1017/S1460396911000513
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Benchmarking can be used to improve hospital performance. It is however not easy to develop a concise and meaningful set of indicators on aspects related to operations management. We developed an indicator set for managers and evaluated its use in an international benchmark of radiotherapy centres. The indicator set assessed the efficiency, patient-centeredness and timeliness of the services delivered. Methods: We identified possible indicators from literature and professionals. Stakeholders' feedback helped to produce a shortlist of indicators. For this indicator set, data were obtained in a pilot that included four European radiotherapy centres. With these data, the indicators were evaluated on definition clarity, data availability, reliability and discriminative value. Results: Literature produced a gross list of 81 indicators. Based on stakeholder feedback, 33 indicators were selected and evaluated in the benchmark. Six negatively evaluated indicators were adapted, together with eight positively evaluated indicators 14 indicators seemed feasible. Examples of indicators concerned utilisation, waiting times, patient satisfaction and risk analysis. Conclusions: This study provides a pragmatic indicator development process for international benchmarks on operations management. The presented indicators showed to be feasible for use in international benchmarking of radiotherapy centres. The pilot identified attainable performance levels and provided leads for improvements.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 38
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Blank JLT, 2007, ADV HEALTH ECON HEAL, V18, P89, DOI 10.1016/S0731-2199(07)00006-4
  • [2] Stakeholder analysis: a review
    Brugha, R
    Varvasovszky, Z
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2000, 15 (03) : 239 - 246
  • [3] Camp R. A., 1993, FINANC EXECUTIVE, V9, P23
  • [4] BENCHMARKING APPLIED TO HEALTH-CARE
    CAMP, RC
    TWEET, AG
    [J]. JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, 1994, 20 (05): : 229 - 238
  • [5] Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care
    Campbell, SM
    Braspenning, J
    Hutchinson, A
    Marshall, M
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 11 (04): : 358 - 364
  • [6] Management of change in health care organisations and human resource role
    Carignani, V
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 33 (01) : 8 - 13
  • [7] Quality indicators in radiotherapy
    Cionini, Luca
    Gardani, Gianstefano
    Gabriele, Pietro
    Magri, Secondo
    Morosini, Pier Luigi
    Rosi, Antonella
    Viti, Vincenza
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 82 (02) : 191 - 200
  • [8] Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, 2001, CROSSING QUALITY CHA
  • [9] Cowper J., 1997, BENCHMARKING EVALUAT
  • [10] Evaluation of an international benchmarking initiative in nine eye hospitals
    de Korne, Dirk F.
    Sol, Kees
    van Wijngaarden, Jeroen D. H.
    van Vliet, Ellen J.
    Custers, Thomas
    Cubbon, Mark
    Spileers, Werner
    Ygge, Jan
    Ang, Chong-Lye
    Klazinga, Niek S.
    [J]. HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2010, 35 (01) : 23 - 35