CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF THE FAILED BACK SURGERY SYNDROME - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF 109 PATIENTS

被引:3
作者
HAMM, B
HARING, B
TRAUPE, H
MAYER, M
机构
[1] FREE UNIV BERLIN, KLINIKUM RUDOLF VIRCHOW, SOZIALPSYCHIAT LAB, D-12203 BERLIN, GERMANY
[2] FREIEN UNIV BERLIN, KLINIKUM STEGLITZ, NEUROCHIRURG KLIN, D-12203 BERLIN, GERMANY
[3] UNIV GIESSEN, NEURORADIOL ABT, RADIOL KLIN, W-6300 GIESSEN, GERMANY
来源
FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 1993年 / 159卷 / 03期
关键词
MR IMAGING; SPINE; FAILED BACK SURGERY SYNDROME; RECURRENT DISC HERNIATION; POSTOPERATIVE SCAR; MR; CONTRAST AGENTS;
D O I
10.1055/s-2008-1032762
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In a prospective study, 132 previously operated disc levels in 109 patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) were examined by MR imaging before and after intravenous application of a contrast agent (0.1 mmol Gd-DTPA/kg). The results were compared with current CT findings in 47 cases. The images were randomized and independently assessed by two experienced radiologists. A second intervention of a total of 30 disc levels was performed in 28 patients. Contrast-enhanced-MR imaging (CE-MRI) improved the differentiation of scar from recurrent disc herniation (RDH) compared to plain MRI and CT. Agreement between the two readers was significantly higher for CE-MRI than for the other two procedures (p less-than-or-equal-to 0,001). CE-MRI additionally had the highest diagnostic accuracy (p less-than-or-equal-to 0.001). The preoperative diagnosis made by CE-MRI was confirmed in 27 (90 %) of the reoperated disc levels. Quantitative evaluation showed that there was no contrast enhancement in RDH as opposed to pronounced enhancement of 122% in scars (p less-than-or-equal-to 0.001). Evaluation with respect to scar age revealed a significant difference (p less-than-or-equal-to 0.01) in contrast enhancement between scars less and more than 2.5 years old.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 277
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
BRAITINGER S, 1987, ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG, V17, P185
[2]  
BRAUN IF, 1985, AM J NEURORADIOL, V6, P607
[3]   CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY SCANNING OF THE POSTOPERATIVE SPINE [J].
BROWN, BM ;
BEDELL, JE ;
FRANK, E .
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 1986, 25 (04) :351-356
[4]  
BUNDSCHUH CV, 1990, AM J NEURORADIOL, V11, P949
[5]  
BURTON CV, 1981, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P191
[6]  
CLAUSSEN C, 1982, FORTSCHR RONTG NEUEN, V136, P1
[7]   MICROSURGICAL REOPERATION FOLLOWING LUMBAR-DISK SURGERY - TIMING, SURGICAL FINDINGS, AND OUTCOME IN 92 PATIENTS [J].
EBELING, U ;
KALBARCYK, H ;
REULEN, HJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1989, 70 (03) :397-404
[8]   ANALYSIS OF FAILURES AND POOR RESULTS OF LUMBAR SPINE SURGERY [J].
FAGER, CA ;
FREIDBERG, SR .
SPINE, 1980, 5 (01) :87-94
[9]   LUMBAR SPINE AFTER SURGERY - EXAMINATION WITH INTRAVENOUS CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT [J].
FIROOZNIA, H ;
KRICHEFF, II ;
RAFII, M ;
GOLIMBU, C .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 163 (01) :221-226
[10]   TIME-DEPENDENT SCAR ENHANCEMENT IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF THE POSTOPERATIVE LUMBAR SPINE [J].
GLICKSTEIN, MF ;
SUSSMAN, SK .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 1991, 20 (05) :333-337