Understanding Multi-purpose Hybrid Voluntary Organizations: The Contributions of Theories on Civil Society, Social Movements and Non-profit Organizations

被引:81
作者
Hasenfeld, Yeheskel [1 ]
Gidron, Benjamin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Affairs, Dept Social Welf, 3250 PPB, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Israeli Ctr, Sect Res 3, Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
Hybrid voluntary organizations; social movements; civil society; non-profit organizations;
D O I
10.1080/17448680500337350
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The paper offers a theoretical framework to study the conditions that lead to the emergence of multi-purpose hybrid voluntary organizations and the factors that influence their ability to mobilize resources and enlist commitment. These organizations are characterized by four interrelated attributes: (a) they set out as their mission to uphold and promote cultural values that are typically at variant with dominant and institutionalized values; (b) they offer services to members and the public that express their distinct values, using the services as a model and catalyst for social change; (c) in addition to their instrumental goals, they aim to meet the expressive and social identity needs of their members by promoting a collective identity; and (d) they evolve into hybrid organizations by having multiple purposes-combining to various degrees goals of value change, service provision and mutual-aid. Because they deliberately combine features of volunteer-run associations, social movements and non-profit service organizations, we articulate a theoretical framework that melds concepts and propositions from the various theoretical perspectives used to study each of these organizational forms. We argue that the expanded theoretical framework offers a more comprehensive and dynamic view of civil society and a better perspective to the study of third sector organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 112
页数:16
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Allahyari Rebecca A., 2000, VISIONS CHARITY VOLU, DOI DOI 10.1525/CALIFORNIA/9780520221444.001.0001
[2]  
Almond G., 1989, CIVIC CULTURE POLITI
[3]   Advocacy organizations in the US political process [J].
Andrews, KT ;
Edwards, B .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2004, 30 :479-506
[4]   Interpersonal trust and voluntary associations: examining three approaches [J].
Anheier, H ;
Kendall, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2002, 53 (03) :343-362
[5]  
BAUER R, 1990, NONPROFIT VOLUNTARY, V19, P199
[6]   INSTITUTIONAL LINKAGES AND ORGANIZATIONAL MORTALITY [J].
BAUM, JAC ;
OLIVER, C .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1991, 36 (02) :187-218
[7]  
Berger P. L., 1996, EMPOWER PEOPLE STATE
[8]   CIVIL-SOCIETY AND DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION IN EAST-CENTRAL-EUROPE [J].
BERNHARD, M .
POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1993, 108 (02) :307-326
[9]  
Bloomfield K., 1994, NONPROFIT VOLUNTARY, V23, P21
[10]  
Bordt R. L., 1998, STRUCTURE WOMENS NON