Informal Science Educators' Views about Nature of Scientific Knowledge

被引:9
作者
Holliday, Gary M. [1 ]
Lederman, Norman G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Akron, Dept Curricular & Instruct Studies, Zook Hall,Room 135, Akron, OH 44325 USA
[2] Illinois Inst Technol, Dept Math & Sci Educ, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION PART B-COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT | 2014年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词
Informal education; Nature of Science; Teacher knowledge;
D O I
10.1080/21548455.2013.788802
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Publications such as Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments [Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2010). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press] and Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits [National Research Council. (2009). Washington, DC: National Academy Press] have documented a recent trend advocating a greater awareness and value of Nature of Science (NOS), also known as Nature of Scientific Knowledge [see Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831-879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum], for informal science learning experiences. However, little in the literature addresses what informal science educators know about science and, in particular, the views they have about NOS. In this study, informal science educators were asked to fill out an online version of the Views of Nature of Scientific Knowledge-Form C questionnaire [Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095; Lederman, N. G., Schwartz, R. S., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Bell, R. L. (2001). Preservice teachers' understanding and teaching of nature of science: An intervention study. The Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 1(2), 135-160]. Along with interview responses, 20 of the fully completed questionnaires were purposefully selected to provide the data for this study. Participants were included if they were actively teaching full time to the public in informal science settings. This criterion for inclusion was utilized in order to address the lack of research about this category of individuals. The surveys underwent qualitative analysis and were coded using a scoring rubric. Overall, participants' demonstrated a strong understanding about NOS but views about the certainty of science were prevalent.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 146
页数:24
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Abd-El-Khalick F, 2000, J RES SCI TEACH, V37, P1057, DOI 10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-C
[3]  
Abd-El-Khalick F. G., 2001, J SCI TEACH EDUC, V12, P215, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1016720417219
[4]   Educational value of different types of exhibits in an interactive science and technology center [J].
Afonso, Ana S. ;
Gilbert, John K. .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2007, 91 (06) :967-987
[5]   The Influence of Guided Inquiry and Explicit Instruction on K-6 Teachers' Views of Nature of Science [J].
Akerson, Valarie L. ;
Hanson, Deborah L. ;
Cullen, Theresa A. .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION, 2007, 18 (05) :751-772
[6]  
*AM ASS ADV SCI, 1994, SCI ALL AM
[7]  
American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1993, BENCHM SCI LIT
[8]  
American Association of Museums, 1984, COMM MUS NEW CENT MU
[9]  
American Association of Museums Standing Professional Comminee on Education, 2000, EXC PRACT MUS ED STA
[10]   Professional Development and the Historical Tradition of Informal Science Institutions: Views of Four Providers [J].
Astor-Jack, Tamsin ;
Balcerzak, Phyllis ;
McCallie, Ellen .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE MATHEMATICS AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, 2006, 6 (01) :67-81