ANIMAL-MODEL ESTIMATION OF GENETIC-PARAMETERS AND RESPONSE TO SELECTION FOR LITTER SIZE AND WEIGHT, GROWTH, AND BACKFAT IN CLOSED SEEDSTOCK POPULATIONS OF LARGE WHITE AND LANDRACE SWINE

被引:73
作者
FERRAZ, JBS [1 ]
JOHNSON, RK [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV NEBRASKA,DEPT ANIM SCI,LINCOLN,NE 68583
关键词
PIGS; MIXED MODELS METHODS; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENETIC TREND;
D O I
10.2527/1993.714850x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Records from 2,495 litters and 14,605 Landrace and Large White pigs from two farms, but established from the same base population and run as replicated selection lines, were analyzed. Selection within herd was on estimated breeding values weighted by economic values. Animal models and REML procedures were used to estimate genetic, phenotypic, and environmental parameters for the number of pigs born alive (NBA), litter weight at 21 d (LW), average daily gain from approximately 30 to 104 kg (ADG), and backfat thickness adjusted to 104 kg (BF). Random animal genetic effects (o), permanent (NBA and LW) or litter (ADG and BF) environmental effects, maternal genetic effects (m), and the covariance between o and m were sequentially added to the model. Estimates of total heritability calculated from all data (h(t)2 = sigma(o)2 + 1/2sigma(m)2 + 3/2sigma(om)) ranged from .01 to . 14 for NBA, from .18 to .22 for LW, from .23 to .34 for ADG, and from .40 to .50 for BF. Maternal genetic variance was from 2.4 to 3.8% of phenotypic variance in NBA, from 1.2 to 3.6% in LW, from .5 to 1.5% in ADG, and from 1.9 to 3.4% in BF. The correlation between o and m was -.07 for NBA, -.25 for LW, -.34 for ADG, and -.26 for BF. Permanent environmental effects explained from 16 to 17% of total phenotypic variation for NBA and from 1.6 to 5.3% for LW. Approximately 7% of the variation in ADG and 5% in BF was due to litter environmental effects. Genetic trends were .012 pigs/yr for NBA, .25 kg/yr for LW, 5.91 g/yr for ADG, and -.063 mm/yr for BF.
引用
收藏
页码:850 / 858
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   GENETIC-IMPROVEMENT OF LITTER SIZE IN PIGS [J].
AVALOS, E ;
SMITH, C .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1987, 44 :153-164
[2]  
AZZAM SM, 1987, J ANIM SCI, V64, P357
[3]   DERIVATIVE-FREE RESTRICTED MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION IN ANIMAL-MODELS WITH A SPARSE-MATRIX SOLVER [J].
BOLDMAN, KG ;
VANVLECK, LD .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1991, 74 (12) :4337-4343
[4]   SELECTION PRACTICES AND GENETIC AND PHENOTYPIC TRENDS ESTIMATED FROM NEBRASKA SPF SWINE FIELD RECORDS [J].
DAVID, PJ ;
JOHNSON, RK ;
SOCHA, TE .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1985, 61 (06) :1411-1420
[5]  
Dickerson G E, 1970, TECHNIQUES PROCEDURE, P36
[6]  
DICKERSON GE, 1947, AGR EXP STA IOWA STA, V354
[7]  
GEORGE A., 1980, USER GUIDE SPARSPAK
[8]   GENETIC-FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO VARIATION IN LITTER SIZE IN BRITISH LARGE WHITE GILTS [J].
HALEY, CS ;
LEE, GJ .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1992, 30 (1-2) :99-113
[9]  
Henderson CR, 1988, J DAIRY SCI, V71, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0022-0302(88)79974-9
[10]   GENETIC EVALUATION OF ON-FARM TESTED PIGS USING AN ANIMAL-MODEL .2. PREDICTION OF BREEDING VALUES WITH A MULTIPLE TRAIT MODEL [J].
HOFER, A ;
HAGGER, C ;
KUNZI, N .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1992, 30 (1-2) :83-98