Bauman and Levinas: Levinas cannot be used

被引:4
作者
Alford, C. Fred [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Govt & Polit, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Bauman; Levinas; postmodern ethics; ethics;
D O I
10.1080/14797585.2013.866814
中图分类号
G [文化、科学、教育、体育]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 04 ;
摘要
The most ambitious attempt to use Emmanuel Levinas to justify a new moral philosophy in a postmodern world is that of Zygmunt Bauman in Postmodern Ethics. Levinas cannot be used. Bauman would use Levinas in order to "desocialize" the subject. That is, to render the subject less a creature of the organization, community, and group, each of which is the enemy of ethics. While Levinas would also desocialize the subject, the terms and concepts he employs are only superficially similar to those employed by Bauman, as well as other social theorists. Terms such as "the other" or the "face" are employed by Levinas in such unique ways that they are unavailable to be used as guidance or inspiration for social theory. In many respects this is a good thing, for it means that Levinas must be encountered on his own terms.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 262
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Abbinnett R, 1998, CULTURE VALUES, V2, P87
[2]  
Adorno T. W., 2005, MINIMA MORALIA REFLE
[3]  
Arendt, REVOLUTION, P165
[4]  
Arendt H., 1978, LIFE MIND
[5]  
Arendt Hannah, 1973, ORIGINS TOTALITARIAN
[6]  
Bauman Z., 1996, ALONE AGAIN ETHICS C
[7]  
Bauman Z., 2018, LIQUID MODERNITY
[8]  
Bauman Z., 1993, POSTMODERN ETHICS
[9]  
BAUMAN Zygmunt, 1989, MODERNITY HOLOCAUST
[10]  
Bernasconi R., 1985, DERRIDA DIFFERENCE, P13