The business case and barriers for responsible management education in business schools

被引:53
作者
Doherty, Bob [1 ]
Meehan, John [2 ]
Richards, Adam [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, York Management Sch, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Liverpool Business Sch, Liverpool L3 5UX, Merseyside, England
关键词
Institutional theory; Business schools; Education for sustainable development (ESD); Higher education (HE); Responsible management education (RME);
D O I
10.1108/JMD-06-2013-0082
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to gain a greater depth of understanding of both the pressures and barriers for embedding responsible management education (RME) within business and management schools. Design/methodology/approach - This paper utilises a longitudinal case study design of six business/management schools. Findings - This research identifies a set of institutional pressures and barriers for RME in the business schools selected. First, the pressures appear to come from a number of external business school sources and the barriers from a series of organisational resource and individual factors. Research limitations/implications - RME cannot be seen as just a bolt on. The orientation needs to change to view RME as requiring a shift in culture/purpose/identity. Due to the barriers this will require systemic organisational change at all levels and an organisational change process to bring about implementation. Practical implications - The results clearly show these market pressures are no passing fad. Failure to respond in a systemic way will mean business schools will run into serious problems with legitimacy. Originality/value - This paper fulfils a need for an in depth study of a number of business schools to identify the barriers to RME. This is now a critical issue for schools and this research has provided a number of practical recommendations which will help business schools overcome the identified barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 60
页数:27
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Academy of Management, 2013, 73 ANN M AC MAN
  • [2] Accenture, 2010, NEW ER SUST GLOB IMA
  • [3] Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research
    Alvesson, Mats
    Sandberg, Joergen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2013, 50 (01) : 128 - 152
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1992, AG 21
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, GUARDIAN
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2007, EC CLIMATE CHANGE
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2012, HARVARD BUSINESS REV
  • [8] Aronowitz S., 2000, KNOWLEDGE FACTORY DI
  • [9] Atfield R., 2013, ENHANCING ED SUSTAIN
  • [10] Barrell S., 2010, INDEPENDENT