An Investigation of the Technical Adequacy of a Daily Behavior Report Card (DBRC) for Monitoring Progress of Students With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Special Education Placements

被引:21
作者
Fabiano, Gregory A. [1 ]
Vujnovic, Rebecca [1 ]
Naylor, Justin [1 ]
Pariseau, Meaghan [1 ]
Robins, Melissa [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Univ Buffalo, 106 Diefendorf Hall, Buffalo, NY 14214 USA
[2] Roswell Pk Canc Inst Upper Gastrointestinal Cance, Buffalo, NY USA
关键词
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; Daily Behavior Report Card; monitor; progress;
D O I
10.1177/1534508409333344
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Many children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are eligible for special education services because of problems with academic and/or social functioning. Thus, a considerable proportion of children with ADHD have individualized education plans (IEPs) that list operationalized goals and objectives for each student. Conceptually, the majority of these children fall within Tiers 2 and 3 of a tiered intervention system because of a need for more intensive behavioral supports. Given the potentially variable behavior of these students in classroom settings and a concurrent need to demonstrate the effectiveness of intervention outcomes, frequent and sustained monitoring of goals and objectives is necessary. For this purpose, direct behavior rating scales such as a Daily Behavior Report Card (DBRC) may serve as an efficient and effective mechanism for progress monitoring. In a sample of 63 students with ADHD receiving special education services, initial psychometric information for the temporal stability, interrater reliability, and content validity of an idiographic, multi-item DBRC is presented. Procedures for integrating a DBRC into standard progress monitoring procedures likely to be useful in intervention monitoring at Tiers 2 and 3 are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 241
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   CHILD ADOLESCENT BEHAVIORAL AND EMOTIONAL-PROBLEMS - IMPLICATIONS OF CROSS-INFORMANT CORRELATIONS FOR SITUATIONAL SPECIFICITY [J].
ACHENBACH, TM ;
MCCONAUGHY, SH ;
HOWELL, CT .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1987, 101 (02) :213-232
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, V4th., DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[3]  
Batsche G., 2005, RESPONSE INTERVENTIO
[4]   Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models [J].
Burns, MK ;
Appleton, JJ ;
Stehouwer, JD .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2005, 23 (04) :381-394
[5]   Barriers to detection, help-seeking, and service use for children with ADHD symptoms [J].
Bussing, R ;
Zima, BT ;
Gary, FA ;
Garvan, CW .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES & RESEARCH, 2003, 30 (02) :176-189
[6]  
Bussing R, 2002, BEHAV DISORDERS, V27, P327
[7]   A statewide study of FAPE and school discipline policies [J].
Butera, G ;
Klein, H ;
McMullen, L ;
Wilson, B .
JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION, 1998, 32 (02) :108-114
[8]  
Chafouleas SM, 2007, SCHOOL PSYCHOL REV, V36, P63
[9]   Daily behavior report cards: An investigation of the consistency of on-task data across raters and methods [J].
Chafouleas, Sandra M. ;
Riley-Tillman, T. Chris ;
Sassu, Kari A. ;
LaFrance, Mary J. ;
Patwa, Shamim S. .
JOURNAL OF POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS, 2007, 9 (01) :30-37
[10]   Foundation for the Development and Use of Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) to Assess and Evaluate Student Behavior [J].
Christ, Theodore J. ;
Riley-Tillman, T. Chris ;
Chafouleas, Sandra M. .
ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION, 2009, 34 (04) :201-213