The Physiological Benefits and Problems Associated With Using Standing and Walking Orthoses in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury-A Meta-analytic Review

被引:7
作者
Karimi, Taghi Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Muscoloskeletal Res Ctr, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
bone mineral density; spinal cord injury;
D O I
10.1016/j.jotr.2011.07.008
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Spinal cord injury (SCI) patients use two transportation systems that include orthosis and wheelchair. It was claimed that standing and walking bring some benefits for SCI patients, such as decreasing bone osteoporosis, preventing pressure sores, and improving various physiological functions. The main question posted here is as follows: Is there enough evidence to support the effect of walking with orthosis on the health status of the patients with SCI? A review of the relevant literature was carried out in Bioengineering Unit of Strathclyde University. The benefits of orthoses were evaluated. Evidence reported in the literature regarding the effectiveness of orthoses for improving the health condition of SCI patients is conflicting. The benefits that were mentioned in various research studies regarding using the orthosis include decreasing bone osteoporosis, preventing joint deformity, improving bowl and bladder function, improving digestive system function, decreasing muscle spasm, improving independent living, improving respiratory and cardiovascular systems function. Improvement of independence living and physiological health of the patients are the only two benefits that are supported by strong evidence. Unfortunately, conflicting results in the literature have led to criticism of most hypotheses based on theoretical grounds, with the effects of using orthoses on the health status remaining a matter of considerable debate.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 40
页数:4
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Effect of weight-bearing activities on bone mineral density in spinal cord injured patients during the period of the first two years [J].
Alekna, V. ;
Tamulaitiene, M. ;
Sinevicius, T. ;
Juocevicius, A. .
SPINAL CORD, 2008, 46 (11) :727-732
[2]   LONGITUDINAL-STUDY OF BONE-MINERAL CONTENT IN THE LUMBAR SPINE, THE FOREARM AND THE LOWER-EXTREMITIES AFTER SPINAL-CORD INJURY [J].
BIERINGSORENSEN, F ;
BOHR, HH ;
SCHAADT, OP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1990, 20 (03) :330-335
[3]   BONE-MINERAL CONTENT OF THE LUMBAR SPINE AND LOWER-EXTREMITIES YEARS AFTER SPINAL-CORD LESION [J].
BIERINGSORENSEN, F ;
BOHR, H ;
SCHAADT, O .
PARAPLEGIA, 1988, 26 (05) :293-301
[4]   ANALYSES OF 94 CONSECUTIVE SPINAL-CORD INJURY PATIENTS USING ASIA DEFINITION AND MODIFIED FRANKEL SCORE CLASSIFICATION [J].
CAPAUL, M ;
ZOLLINGER, H ;
SATZ, N ;
DIETZ, V ;
LEHMANN, D ;
SCHURCH, B .
PARAPLEGIA, 1994, 32 (09) :583-587
[5]   WALKING AND WHEELCHAIR ENERGETICS IN PERSONS WITH PARAPLEGIA [J].
CERNY, K ;
WATERS, R ;
HISLOP, H ;
PERRY, J .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1980, 60 (09) :1133-1139
[6]  
Clowers M., 1981, HDB SEVERE DISABILIT
[7]   BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF 2-PARAPLEGIC GAIT PATTERNS [J].
CROSBIE, WJ ;
NICOL, AC .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1990, 5 (02) :97-107
[8]   Upper extremity pain after spinal cord injury [J].
Dalyan, M ;
Cardenas, DD ;
Gerard, B .
SPINAL CORD, 1999, 37 (03) :191-195
[9]  
DOUGLAS R, 1983, ORTHOPEDICS, V6, P834, DOI 10.3928/0147-7447-19830701-05
[10]   Follow-up assessment of standing mobility device users [J].
Dunn, RB ;
Walter, JS ;
Lucero, Y ;
Weaver, F ;
Langbein, E ;
Fehr, L ;
Johnson, P ;
Riedy, L .
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 10 (02) :84-93