THE SEMANTIC APPROACH TO EVOLUTIONARY-THEORY

被引:9
作者
ERESHEFSKY, M
机构
[1] Department of Philosophy, Washington University, St. Louis, 63130, MO, One Brookings Drive
关键词
EVOLUTION; SEMANTIC APPROACH; THEORY;
D O I
10.1007/BF02426826
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
Paul Thompson, John Beatty, and Elisabeth Lloyd argue that attempts to resolve certain conceptual issues within evolutionary biology have failed because of a general adherence to the received view of scientific theories. They maintain that such issues can be clarified and resolved when one adopts a semantic approach to theories. In this paper, I argue that such conceptual issues are just as problematic on a semantic approach. Such issues arise from the complexity involved in providing formal accounts of theoretical laws and scientific explanations. That complexity is due to empirical and pragmatic considerations, not one's adherence to a particular formal approach to theories. This analysis raises a broader question. How can any formal account properly represent the complex nature of empirical phenomena? © 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 80
页数:22
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
ACHINSTEIN P, 1968, CONCEPT SCI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1963, PHILOS SCI REALISM
[4]  
Beatty J., 1981, PSA 1980, VTwo
[5]  
BEATTY J, 1987, BIOL PHILOS, V2, P17
[6]  
CARNAP R, 1966, PHILOS F PHYSICS
[7]  
CARTWRIGHT N, 1983, HOW LAWS PHYSICS LIE
[8]  
CROW J, 1983, GENETICS NOTES
[9]   GENES THAT VIOLATE MENDEL RULES [J].
CROW, JF .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1979, 240 (02) :134-&
[10]  
Dawkins R., 1982, pi