Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-Go Task With a Diffusion Model

被引:53
作者
Ratcliff, Roger [1 ]
Huang-Pollock, Cynthia [2 ]
McKoon, Gail [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
DECISION-WASHINGTON | 2018年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
diffusion model; reaction time (RT); response accuracy; go/no-go task; CPT task;
D O I
10.1037/dec0000065
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The go/no-go task is one in which there are two choices. but the subject responds only to one of them, waiting out a time-out for the other choice. The task has a long history in psychology and modern applications in the clinical/neuropsychological domain. In this article, we fit a diffusion model to both experimental and simulated data. The model is the same as the two-choice model and assumes that there are two decision boundaries and termination at one of them produces a response, and at the other, the subject waits out the trial. In prior modeling, both two-choice and go/no-go data were fit simultaneously. and only group data were fit. Here the model is fit to just go/no-go data for individual subjects. This allows analyses of individual differences, which is important for clinical applications. First, we fit the standard two-choice model to two-choice data and fit the go/no-go model to reaction times (RTs) from one of the choices and accuracy from the two-choice data. Parameter values were similar between the models and had high correlations. The go/no-go model was also fit to data from a go/no-go version of the task with the same subjects as the two-choice task. A simulation study with ranges of parameter values that are obtained in practice showed similar parameter recovery between the two-choice and go/no-go models. Results show that a diffusion model with an implicit (no response) boundary can be fit to data with almost the same accuracy as fitting the two-choice model to two-choice data.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 62
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Color-induced cognitive conflicts affect muscle activity prior to gait initiation in the Go/No-go task
    Horinouchi, Takayuki
    Ishida, Haruki
    Yang, Kangjing
    Li, Jingnan
    Morishita, Takuya
    Watanabe, Tatsunori
    Kirimoto, Hikari
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
  • [22] Anxiety-Mediated Facilitation of Behavioral Inhibition: Threat Processing and Defensive Reactivity During a Go/No-Go Task
    Grillon, Christian
    Robinson, Oliver J.
    Krimsky, Marissa
    O'Connell, Katherine
    Alvarez, Gabriella
    Ernst, Monique
    EMOTION, 2017, 17 (02) : 259 - 266
  • [23] MEG study of occipital lobe function changes according to task demand using a visual Go/No-Go paradigm
    Takei, Y
    Kumano, S
    Hattori, S
    Uehara, T
    Fukuda, M
    Mikuni, M
    UNVEILING THE MYSTERY OF THE BRAIN: NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE BRAIN FUNCTION, 2005, 1278 : 173 - 176
  • [24] Multisensory processing of redundant information in go/no-go and choice responses
    Blurton, Steven P.
    Greenlee, Mark W.
    Gondan, Matthias
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2014, 76 (04) : 1212 - 1233
  • [25] Zooming in on the Cause of the Perceptual Load Effect in the Go/No-Go Paradigm
    Chen, Zhe
    Cave, Kyle R.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2016, 42 (08) : 1072 - 1087
  • [26] Patterns of brain activity in choice or instructed go and no-go tasks
    Isfahani, Sanaz Attaripour
    Mcgurrin, Patrick
    Vial, Felipe
    Hallett, Mark
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2025, 243 (03)
  • [27] Pramipexole Increases Go Timeouts but Not No-go Errors in Healthy Volunteers
    Yang, Xue Qing
    Glizer, Daniel
    Vo, Andrew
    Seergobin, Ken N.
    MacDonald, Penny A.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [28] Relationship between limbic and cortical 5-HT neurotransmission and acquisition and reversal learning in a go/no-go task in rats
    Daiki Masaki
    Chihiro Yokoyama
    Seijiro Kinoshita
    Hideto Tsuchida
    Yasuhito Nakatomi
    Kanji Yoshimoto
    Kenji Fukui
    Psychopharmacology, 2006, 189 : 249 - 258
  • [29] The Effects of Impulsivity, Sexual Arousability, and Abstract Intellectual Ability on Men’s and Women’s Go/No-Go Task Performance
    Kathryn R. Macapagal
    Erick Janssen
    Daniel J. Fridberg
    Peter R. Finn
    Julia R. Heiman
    Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2011, 40 : 995 - 1006
  • [30] Relationship between limbic and cortical 5-HT neurotransmission and acquisition and reversal learning in a go/no-go task in rats
    Masaki, Daiki
    Yokoyama, Chihiro
    Kinoshita, Seijiro
    Tsuchida, Hideto
    Nakatomi, Yasuhito
    Yoshimoto, Kanji
    Fukui, Kenji
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 189 (02) : 249 - 258