Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-Go Task With a Diffusion Model

被引:56
作者
Ratcliff, Roger [1 ]
Huang-Pollock, Cynthia [2 ]
McKoon, Gail [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
DECISION-WASHINGTON | 2018年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
diffusion model; reaction time (RT); response accuracy; go/no-go task; CPT task;
D O I
10.1037/dec0000065
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The go/no-go task is one in which there are two choices. but the subject responds only to one of them, waiting out a time-out for the other choice. The task has a long history in psychology and modern applications in the clinical/neuropsychological domain. In this article, we fit a diffusion model to both experimental and simulated data. The model is the same as the two-choice model and assumes that there are two decision boundaries and termination at one of them produces a response, and at the other, the subject waits out the trial. In prior modeling, both two-choice and go/no-go data were fit simultaneously. and only group data were fit. Here the model is fit to just go/no-go data for individual subjects. This allows analyses of individual differences, which is important for clinical applications. First, we fit the standard two-choice model to two-choice data and fit the go/no-go model to reaction times (RTs) from one of the choices and accuracy from the two-choice data. Parameter values were similar between the models and had high correlations. The go/no-go model was also fit to data from a go/no-go version of the task with the same subjects as the two-choice task. A simulation study with ranges of parameter values that are obtained in practice showed similar parameter recovery between the two-choice and go/no-go models. Results show that a diffusion model with an implicit (no response) boundary can be fit to data with almost the same accuracy as fitting the two-choice model to two-choice data.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 62
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   POTENTIALS ASSOCIATED WITH THE INITIATION AND INHIBITION OF VISUALLY TRIGGERED FINGER MOVEMENT IN HUMANS - THE NO-GO POTENTIAL IN THE GO NO-GO PARADIGM [J].
NATIV, A ;
LAZARUS, JAC ;
NATIV, J ;
JOSEPH, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1992, 66 (1-2) :107-118
[22]   Color-induced cognitive conflicts affect muscle activity prior to gait initiation in the Go/No-go task [J].
Horinouchi, Takayuki ;
Ishida, Haruki ;
Yang, Kangjing ;
Li, Jingnan ;
Morishita, Takuya ;
Watanabe, Tatsunori ;
Kirimoto, Hikari .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
[23]   Anxiety-Mediated Facilitation of Behavioral Inhibition: Threat Processing and Defensive Reactivity During a Go/No-Go Task [J].
Grillon, Christian ;
Robinson, Oliver J. ;
Krimsky, Marissa ;
O'Connell, Katherine ;
Alvarez, Gabriella ;
Ernst, Monique .
EMOTION, 2017, 17 (02) :259-266
[24]   MEG study of occipital lobe function changes according to task demand using a visual Go/No-Go paradigm [J].
Takei, Y ;
Kumano, S ;
Hattori, S ;
Uehara, T ;
Fukuda, M ;
Mikuni, M .
UNVEILING THE MYSTERY OF THE BRAIN: NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE BRAIN FUNCTION, 2005, 1278 :173-176
[25]   Multisensory processing of redundant information in go/no-go and choice responses [J].
Blurton, Steven P. ;
Greenlee, Mark W. ;
Gondan, Matthias .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2014, 76 (04) :1212-1233
[26]   Zooming in on the Cause of the Perceptual Load Effect in the Go/No-Go Paradigm [J].
Chen, Zhe ;
Cave, Kyle R. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2016, 42 (08) :1072-1087
[27]   Patterns of brain activity in choice or instructed go and no-go tasks [J].
Isfahani, Sanaz Attaripour ;
Mcgurrin, Patrick ;
Vial, Felipe ;
Hallett, Mark .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2025, 243 (03)
[28]   Pramipexole Increases Go Timeouts but Not No-go Errors in Healthy Volunteers [J].
Yang, Xue Qing ;
Glizer, Daniel ;
Vo, Andrew ;
Seergobin, Ken N. ;
MacDonald, Penny A. .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
[29]   Relationship between limbic and cortical 5-HT neurotransmission and acquisition and reversal learning in a go/no-go task in rats [J].
Daiki Masaki ;
Chihiro Yokoyama ;
Seijiro Kinoshita ;
Hideto Tsuchida ;
Yasuhito Nakatomi ;
Kanji Yoshimoto ;
Kenji Fukui .
Psychopharmacology, 2006, 189 :249-258
[30]   The Effects of Impulsivity, Sexual Arousability, and Abstract Intellectual Ability on Men’s and Women’s Go/No-Go Task Performance [J].
Kathryn R. Macapagal ;
Erick Janssen ;
Daniel J. Fridberg ;
Peter R. Finn ;
Julia R. Heiman .
Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2011, 40 :995-1006