Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-Go Task With a Diffusion Model

被引:56
作者
Ratcliff, Roger [1 ]
Huang-Pollock, Cynthia [2 ]
McKoon, Gail [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
DECISION-WASHINGTON | 2018年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
diffusion model; reaction time (RT); response accuracy; go/no-go task; CPT task;
D O I
10.1037/dec0000065
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The go/no-go task is one in which there are two choices. but the subject responds only to one of them, waiting out a time-out for the other choice. The task has a long history in psychology and modern applications in the clinical/neuropsychological domain. In this article, we fit a diffusion model to both experimental and simulated data. The model is the same as the two-choice model and assumes that there are two decision boundaries and termination at one of them produces a response, and at the other, the subject waits out the trial. In prior modeling, both two-choice and go/no-go data were fit simultaneously. and only group data were fit. Here the model is fit to just go/no-go data for individual subjects. This allows analyses of individual differences, which is important for clinical applications. First, we fit the standard two-choice model to two-choice data and fit the go/no-go model to reaction times (RTs) from one of the choices and accuracy from the two-choice data. Parameter values were similar between the models and had high correlations. The go/no-go model was also fit to data from a go/no-go version of the task with the same subjects as the two-choice task. A simulation study with ranges of parameter values that are obtained in practice showed similar parameter recovery between the two-choice and go/no-go models. Results show that a diffusion model with an implicit (no response) boundary can be fit to data with almost the same accuracy as fitting the two-choice model to two-choice data.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 62
页数:21
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   A Bayesian hierarchical mixture approach to individual differences: Case studies in selective attention and representation in category learning [J].
Bartlema, Annelies ;
Lee, Michael ;
Wetzels, Ruud ;
Vanpaemel, Wolf .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 59 :132-150
[2]   Go-no-go task performance improvement after anodal transcranial DC stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major depression [J].
Boggio, Paulo S. ;
Bermpohl, Felix ;
Vergara, Adriana O. ;
Muniz, Ana L. C. R. ;
Nahas, Fernanda H. ;
Leme, Priscila B. ;
Rigonatti, Sergio P. ;
Fregni, Felipe .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2007, 101 (1-3) :91-98
[3]   A meta-analysis of response inhibition and Stroop interference control deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) [J].
Dimoska-Di Marco, Aneta ;
McDonald, Skye ;
Kelly, Michelle ;
Tate, Robyn ;
Johnstone, Stuart .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 33 (04) :471-485
[4]   Abnormal ventral frontal response during performance of an affective go/no go task in patients with mania [J].
Elliott, R ;
Ogilvie, A ;
Rubinsztein, JS ;
Calderon, G ;
Dolan, RJ ;
Sahakian, BJ .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 55 (12) :1163-1170
[5]   An Information Processing/Associative Learning Account of Behavioral Disinhibition in Externalizing Psychopathology [J].
Endres, Michael J. ;
Donkin, Chris ;
Finn, Peter R. .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 22 (02) :122-132
[6]   Acquiring and inhibiting prepotent responses in schizophrenia - Event-related brain potentials and functional magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Ford, JM ;
Gray, M ;
Whitfield, SL ;
Turken, AU ;
Glover, G ;
Faustman, WO ;
Mathalon, DH .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 61 (02) :119-129
[7]   Prepotent Response Inhibition and Interference Control in Autism Spectrum Disorders: Two Meta-Analyses [J].
Geurts, Hilde M. ;
van den Bergh, Sanne F. W. M. ;
Ruzzano, Laura .
AUTISM RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (04) :407-420
[8]   A model of the Go/No-Go task [J].
Gomez, Pablo ;
Perea, Manuel ;
Ratcliff, Roger .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2007, 136 (03) :389-413
[9]   Using the Diffusion Model to Explain Cognitive Deficits in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder [J].
Huang-Pollock, Cynthia ;
Ratcliff, Roger ;
McKoon, Gail ;
Shapiro, Zvi ;
Weigard, Alex ;
Galloway-Long, Hilary .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 45 (01) :57-68
[10]   Evaluating Vigilance Deficits in ADHD: A Meta-Analysis of CPT Performance [J].
Huang-Pollock, Cynthia L. ;
Karalunas, Sarah L. ;
Tam, Helen ;
Moore, Amy N. .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 121 (02) :360-371