A review on the status of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) cholecystectomy: techniques and challenges

被引:7
作者
Meadows, Michael C. [1 ,3 ]
Chamberlain, Ronald S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] St Barnabas Hosp, Dept Surg, Livingston, NJ USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Dept Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[3] St Georges Univ, Sch Med, True Blue, West Indies, Grenada
关键词
natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery; NOTES; cholecystectomy; transvaginal; transgastric; transrectal; transcolonic;
D O I
10.2147/OAS.S7300
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The evolution of techniques for the performance of a cholecystectomy over the last 25 years has been swift. The laparoscopic approach is now the gold standard for removal of the gall bladder and is the most frequently performed minimally invasive procedure globally. Currently in its infancy stage, natural orifice transluminal endoscopy surgery, or NOTES, is purported to be the next leap forward in minimally invasive approaches. The safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of this procedure, as well as the significance of potential benefits to patients beyond current surgical approaches are yet undetermined. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, a search engine created by the National Library of Medicine. Keywords used in the search included "natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery", "NOTES", "cholecystectomy", "transcolonic", "transvaginal", and "transgastric". The accumulated literature was critically analyzed and reviewed. Results: One-hundred and eighty-six cases of NOTES cholecystectomies have been published to date. Of these, 174 have been performed through a transvaginal approach. The remainder of the procedures were performed transgastrically. There are no published reports of transcolonic cholecystectomies performed in humans. Four of 186 cases (2.15%) were converted to traditional laparoscopy due to intraoperative complications. No significant complications or mortalities have been reported. Conclusion: NOTES cholecystectomy appears to be a feasible procedure. However, technical, safety, and ethical issues remain relatively unresolved. Besides improved cosmesis, whether additional patient benefits are likely to accrue, in comparison to traditional laparoscopic - cholecystectomy or single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), is unclear. Development of instrumentation to facilitate novel NOTES techniques is in its infancy, but is critical if NOTES is to be broadly applicable. Larger human trials, the development of technological and - educational platforms, and an open discussion regarding the ethical concerns are necessary if this approach is to move forward.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 86
页数:14
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Training on NOTES: From history we learn
    Al-Akash, M.
    Boyle, E.
    Tanner, W. A.
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2009, 18 (02): : 111 - 119
  • [2] Challenges and lessons learned from NOTES cholecystectomy initial experience: a stepwise approach from the laboratory to clinical application
    Asakuma, Mitsuhiro
    Perretta, Silvana
    Allemann, Pierre
    Cahill, Ronan
    Con, Sergio A.
    Solano, Cinthya
    Pasupathy, Shanker
    Mutter, Didier
    Dallemagne, Bernard
    Marescaux, Jacques
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2009, 16 (03): : 249 - 254
  • [3] Human NOTES Cholecystectomy: Transgastric Hybrid Technique
    Auyang, Edward D.
    Hungness, Eric S.
    Vaziri, Khashayar
    Martin, John A.
    Soper, Nathaniel J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2009, 13 (06) : 1149 - 1150
  • [4] Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): dissection for the critical view of safety during transcolonic cholecystectomy
    Auyang, Edward D.
    Hungness, Eric S.
    Vaziri, Khashayar
    Martin, John A.
    Soper, Nathaniel J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (05): : 1117 - 1118
  • [5] Transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy: a hybrid approach to natural orifice surgery
    Bessler, Marc
    Stevens, Peter D.
    Milone, Luca
    Parikh, Manish
    Fowler, Dennis
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 66 (06) : 1243 - 1245
  • [6] The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Bittner, R
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2004, 389 (03) : 157 - 163
  • [7] Initial experience with hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy
    Branco Filho, Alcides Jose
    Noda, Rafael William
    Kondo, William
    Kawahara, Nilton
    Rangel, Marlion
    Branco, Anibal Wood
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 66 (06) : 1245 - 1248
  • [8] MINIMAL INVASIVE SURGERY IN THE LOCAL TREATMENT OF RECTAL-CANCER
    BUESS, G
    MENTGES, B
    MANNCKE, K
    STARLINGER, M
    BECKER, HD
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1991, 6 (02) : 77 - 81
  • [9] Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery - here and now
    Cahill, Ronan A.
    [J]. SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2010, 8 (01): : 44 - 50
  • [10] A Comprehensive Review of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) Techniques for Cholecystectomy
    Chamberlain, Ronald Scott
    Sakpal, Sujit Vijay
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2009, 13 (09) : 1733 - 1740