THE EFFECTS OF GENERATION ON ITEM AND ORDER RETENTION IN IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED RECALL

被引:34
作者
BURNS, DJ [1 ]
CURTI, ET [1 ]
LAVIN, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] LAFAYETTE COLL,EASTON,PA 18042
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03202752
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent research has shown that generating words from fragments, relative to simply reading them, inhibits processing of order information. Nairne, Riegler, and Serra (1991) showed that this reduction in processing of order information leads to deficits in recall performance. In three experiments, we generally replicate Nairne et al.'s results and demonstrate that the deficit in recall for the generated items is dependent on the easy distractor task and the relatively short (30-sec) retention interval they used. When a difficult distractor task was used, generating produced a deficit in amount of order information processed, but actually facilitated recall when recall was delayed 80 sec. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that generating words inhibits order processing, but they do not support the contention that the reduction in order processing is responsible for the deficit in recall that is sometimes observed for the generated items. The importance of the item-order distinction in explaining the generation effect, as well as the role of the item-order distinction in the long-term-memory arena, is questioned.
引用
收藏
页码:846 / 852
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   THE PROCESS OF FREE-RECALL - EVIDENCE FOR NON-ASSOCIATIVE FACTORS IN ACQUISITION AND RETENTION [J].
ASCH, SE ;
EBENHOLTZ, SM .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1962, 54 (01) :3-31
[2]   THE GENERATION EFFECT - EVIDENCE FOR GENERALIZED INHIBITION [J].
BEGG, I ;
SNIDER, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1987, 13 (04) :553-563
[3]   THE GENERATION EFFECT - A TEST BETWEEN SINGLE-FACTOR AND MULTIFACTOR THEORIES [J].
BURNS, DJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1990, 16 (06) :1060-1067
[4]   THE CONSEQUENCES OF GENERATION [J].
BURNS, DJ .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1992, 31 (05) :615-633
[5]  
BURNS DJ, 1986, DIFFERENTIAL RATES F
[6]  
EINSTEIN GO, 1984, J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN, V10, P133
[7]   THE GENERATION EFFECT - SUPPORT FOR A 2-FACTOR THEORY [J].
HIRSHMAN, E ;
BJORK, RA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1988, 14 (03) :484-494
[8]   SHORT-TERM RECALL AS A FUNCTION OF COVERT REHEARSAL AND OF INTERVENING TASK [J].
KROLL, NEA ;
KELLICUT, MH .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1972, 11 (02) :196-+
[9]   A CONTEXTUAL ACCOUNT OF THE GENERATION EFFECT - A 3-FACTOR THEORY [J].
MCDANIEL, MA ;
WADDILL, PJ ;
EINSTEIN, GO .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1988, 27 (05) :521-536
[10]   SIMILARITY AND LONG-TERM-MEMORY FOR ORDER [J].
NAIRNE, JS .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1990, 29 (06) :733-746