Mass shootings in Australia and the United States, 1981-2013

被引:11
作者
Lemieux, Frederic [1 ]
Bricknell, Samantha [2 ]
Prenzler, Tim [3 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Sociol, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] Australian Inst Criminol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Univ Sunshine Coast, Dept Arts & Business, Sunshine Coast, Qld, Australia
关键词
Offenders; Risk; Crime prevention and reduction; Evidence-based practice; Victims; Community safety;
D O I
10.1108/JCRPP-05-2015-0013
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to compare the incidence and main characteristics of mass shooting events in Australia and the USA in the period 1981-2013. Design/methodology/approach - The study adopted a conservative definition of mass shootings derived from the US Federal Bureau of Investigation, covering four or more fatalities not including the offender. Australian cases were accessed from the Australian Institute of Criminology's National Homicide Monitoring Programme (NHMP) database and several secondary sources. The US data were collected from the Mother Jones database, a report prepared for Mayors Against Illegal Guns and a New York Police Department report. The time series data were related to changes in firearms regulations in the two jurisdictions. Findings - For Australia, the study identified 13 mass shooting events and 104 fatalities from gunshot wounds. For the USA, there were 73 events and 576 victims. Of note is the fact that all cases in Australia pre-dated the implementation of the restrictive 1996 National Firearms Agreement. In the USA, a small decline was evident during the 1994-2004 Federal Assault Weapon Ban. Incidents and fatalities increased after 2004. Research limitations/implications - Of necessity, the paper adopts a conservative FBI-based definition of mass shootings that limits the number of cases captured. The absence of an official government US database also most likely limits the number of cases identified. Practical implications - The findings lend support to policy considerations regarding regulating access to firearms. Originality/value - The paper is unique in comparing mass shootings in these two jurisdictions over three decades in association with changes in firearms regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 142
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Alpers P., 2010, MASS SHOOTINGS UNPUB
[2]   Reassessing the Association between Gun Availability and Homicide at the Cross-National Level [J].
Altheimer I. ;
Boswell M. .
American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2012, 37 (4) :682-704
[3]  
Australasian Police Ministers' Council, 2002, NATL HANDG CONTR AGR
[4]  
Australasian Police Ministers' Council, 1996, NATL FIEARMS AGR
[5]   Gun laws and sudden death - Did the Australian firearms legislation of 1996 make a difference? [J].
Baker, Jeanine ;
McPhedran, Samara .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2007, 47 (03) :455-469
[6]  
Behavioral Analysis Unit, 2008, NATL CTR NAL VIOL
[7]   The Nature of Mass Murder and Autogenic Massacre [J].
Bowers, Thomas G. ;
Holmes, Eric S. ;
Rhom, Ashley .
JOURNAL OF POLICE AND CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 25 (02) :59-66
[8]  
Bridges FS, 2004, PSYCHOL REP, V94, P819
[9]  
Bridges FS, 2004, PERCEPT MOTOR SKILL, V98, P594
[10]  
Carcach C., 2002, HOMICIDE STUDIES, V6, P107