Students With or At Risk for Problem Behavior: Betwixt and Between Teacher and Parent Expectations

被引:13
作者
Beebe-Frankenberger, Margaret [1 ]
Lane, Kathleen Lynne [2 ]
Bocian, Kathleen M. [3 ]
Gresham, Frank M. [4 ]
MacMillan, Donald L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montana, Sch Psychol, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Peabody Coll, Dept Special Educ, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[3] Univ Calif Riverside, Alpha Ctr, Acad Res, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[4] Univ Calif Riverside, Grad Sch Educ, Sch Psychol Program, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[5] Univ Calif Riverside, Grad Sch Educ, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
来源
PREVENTING SCHOOL FAILURE | 2005年 / 49卷 / 02期
关键词
at-risk children/adolescents; behavioral expectations; problem behavior; social competence; social skills;
D O I
10.3200/PSFL.49.2.10-17
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study examined differences between teacher and parent ratings of social skills in a sample of adolescent students (n = 33) previously identified in the elementary grades as at risk for academic or behavioral concerns, or both. Findings suggest a core of 4 classroom behavioral expectations for social competence consistent across elementary and secondary school teachers. Furthermore, parents and teachers of adolescents with behavior problems reported different behavioral expectations. Teachers value behaviors almost entirely in the cooperation domain, rating skills that display assertion and self-control as less important for success in the classroom. Conversely, parents of children with behavior problems at school value behaviors at home in the self-control, responsibility, and assertion domains rather than cooperation skills. Although this may be situation specific, the fact that teachers and parents differentially judged adolescents with behavior problems from their peers suggests several potential targets for early prevention or intervention in collaboration with parents. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 17
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Sorting second-grade students: Differentiating those retained from those promoted [J].
Beebe-Frankenberger, M ;
Bocian, KM ;
MacMillan, DL ;
Gresham, FM .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 96 (02) :204-215
[2]  
Beebe-Frankenberger M. E., 2000, THESIS, V61, P3950
[3]  
Booth A., 1996, SCH CHILDREN RISK, P67
[4]  
BRODY GH, 1992, PARENTAL BELIEF SYST, P415
[5]   EFFECTS OF ACADEMIC TUTORING ON THE SOCIAL-STATUS OF LOW-ACHIEVING, SOCIALLY REJECTED CHILDREN [J].
COIE, JD ;
KREHBIEL, G .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1984, 55 (04) :1465-1478
[6]  
COLVIN G, 1993, PROACTIVE SCH WIDE D
[7]   THE FUTURE OF RESEARCH ON THE TREATMENT OF CONDUCT DISORDER [J].
DODGE, KA .
DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 1993, 5 (1-2) :311-319
[8]  
Epstein J., 1996, FAMILY SCH LINKS THE, P209
[9]  
Festinger L., 1957, THEORY COGNITIVE DIS
[10]   ISSUES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF SOCIAL COMPETENCE IN CHILDREN [J].
FOSTER, SL ;
RITCHEY, WL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1979, 12 (04) :625-638