Liraglutide Versus Sitagliptin in a 24-week, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Parallel-group Study in Japanese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Responding Inadequately to a Sulfonylurea and/or One or Two Other Oral Antidiabetic Drugs (JDDM 33)

被引:6
作者
Yokoyama, Hiroki [1 ]
Hirao, Koichi [2 ]
Yamaguchi, Kohei [3 ]
Oishi, Mariko [4 ]
Lee, Gendai [5 ]
Yagi, Noriharu [6 ]
Takamura, Hiroshi [7 ]
Kashiwagi, Atsunori [8 ]
机构
[1] Jiyugaoka Med Clin, Internal Med, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
[2] HEC Sci Clin, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[3] Kaiseikai Tsutsumi Hosp, Hitoyoshi, Japan
[4] Oishi Clin, Kyoto, Japan
[5] Lee Med Clin, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
[6] Yagi Med Clin, Naha, Japan
[7] Takamura Internal Med Clin, Fussa, Japan
[8] Kusatsu Gen Hosp, Kusatsu, Japan
来源
JAPANESE CLINICAL MEDICINE | 2014年 / 5卷
关键词
liraglutide; sitagliptin; sulfonylurea; RCT; Type; 2; diabetes; beta Cell function; C peptide;
D O I
10.4137/JCM.S16585
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Liraglutide (glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1] receptor agonist) and sitagliptin (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor) are approved in Japan for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We compared the efficacy and safety of adding liraglutide or sitagliptin to a sulfonylurea in Japanese T2DM patients. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to <80 years with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c; National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program [NGSP]) of 6.9-9.4%, body mass index <= 35 kg/m(2), and treatment with a sulfonylurea and/or one or two non-sulfonylurea oral antidiabetic drugs for greater than or equal to eight weeks before enrollment were eligible. Patients were randomized in an open-label manner to either 0.9 mg/day liraglutide (n = 50) or 50-100 mg/day sitagliptin (n = 49) and were treated for 24 weeks. Non-sulfonylureas were discontinued before randomization. Patients using other oral antidiabetic drugs started sulfonylurea treatment. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 24. RESULTS: HbA1c decreased in both groups, and the reduction was significantly greater throughout in the liraglutide group except for Week 24 (0.59 +/- 0.80 vs. 0.24 +/- 0.94%; P = 0.0525). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) decreased significantly in the liraglutide group compared with the sitagliptin group (-21.15 +/- 31.22 vs. +0.46 +/- 39.39 mg/dL; P = 0.0014). Homeostasis model assessment of beta cell function and C- peptide increased significantly in the liraglutide group but not in the sitagliptin group. Hypoglycemic symptoms and adverse events occurred in four and nine patients, respectively, in the liraglutide group, and in two and five patients, respectively, in the sitagliptin group. CONCLUSION: Treatment with liraglutide or sitagliptin together with a sulfonylurea improved HbA1c in Japanese T2DM patients in primary care. Both drugs were associated with low rates of adverse events and hypoglycemia. The improvement in ss cell function probably contributed to the improvement in glycemic control in the liraglutide group.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 41
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety over 26 weeks of an oral treatment strategy including sitagliptin compared with an injectable treatment strategy with liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin: a randomised clinical trial
    Charbonnel, B.
    Steinberg, H.
    Eymard, E.
    Xu, L.
    Thakkar, P.
    Prabhu, V.
    Davies, M. J.
    Engel, S. S.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2013, 56 (07) : 1503 - 1511
  • [2] Liraglutide improves treatment satisfaction in people with Type 2 diabetes compared with sitagliptin, each as an add on to metformin
    Davies, M.
    Pratley, R.
    Hammer, M.
    Thomsen, A. B.
    Cuddihy, R.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2011, 28 (03) : 333 - 337
  • [3] The place of sulfonylureas in the therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Del Prato, S
    Pulizzi, N
    [J]. METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2006, 55 (05): : S20 - S27
  • [4] Independent glucose and weight-reducing effects of Liraglutide in a real-world population of type 2 diabetic outpatients
    Fadini, Gian Paolo
    Simioni, Natalino
    Frison, Vera
    Dal Pos, Michela
    Bettio, Michela
    Rocchini, Paola
    Avogaro, Angelo
    [J]. ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2013, 50 (06) : 943 - 949
  • [5] Liraglutide versus glimepiride monotherapy for type 2 diabetes (LEAD-3 Mono): a randomised, 52-week, phase III, double-blind, parallel-treatment trial
    Garber, Alan
    Henry, Robert
    Ratner, Robert
    Garcia-Hernandez, Pedro A.
    Rodriguez-Pattzi, Hiromi
    Olvera-Alvarez, Israel
    Hale, Paula M.
    Zdravkovic, Milan
    Bode, Bruce
    [J]. LANCET, 2009, 373 (9662) : 473 - 481
  • [6] Liraglutide: from clinical trials to clinical practice
    Gough, S. C. L.
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2012, 14 : 33 - 40
  • [7] The association between Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale scores and glycemic control is modified by types of diabetes therapy: Diabetes Distress and Care Registry in Tenri (DDCRT 2)
    Hayashino, Yasuaki
    Okamura, Shintaro
    Matsunaga, Satoshi
    Tsujii, Satoru
    Ishii, Hitoshi
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 97 (03) : 405 - 410
  • [8] Six-month multicentric, open-label, randomized trial of twice-daily injections of biphasic insulin aspart 30 versus multiple daily injections of insulin aspart in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients (JDDM 11)
    Hirao, Koichi
    Arai, Keiko
    Yamauchi, Mikio
    Takagi, Hirofumi
    Kobayashi, Masashi
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 79 (01) : 171 - 176
  • [9] Ishii H, 2000, TONYOBYO J JAPAN DIA, V43, P13
  • [10] Improved glycaemic control with minimal hypoglycaemia and no weight change with the once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue liraglutide as add-on to sulphonylurea in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes
    Kaku, K.
    Rasmussen, M. F.
    Clauson, P.
    Seino, Y.
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2010, 12 (04) : 341 - 347