Impact of Surgical Varicocele Repair on Pregnancy Rate in Subfertile Men With Clinical Varicocele and Impaired Semen Quality: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

被引:47
作者
Kim, Kyu Hyun [1 ]
Lee, Joo Yong [1 ]
Kang, Dong Hyuk [2 ]
Lee, Hyungmin [3 ]
Seo, Ju Tae [4 ]
Cho, Kang Su [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Hosp, Urol Sci Inst,Dept Urol, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Natl Forens Hosp, Minist Justice, Dept Urol, Gongju, South Korea
[3] Korea Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Epidem Intelligence Serv, Cheongwon, South Korea
[4] Kwandong Univ, Coll Med, Cheil Gen Hosp & Womens Healthcare Ctr, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Infertility; Meta-analysis; Treatment outcome; Varicocele;
D O I
10.4111/kju.2013.54.10.703
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To elucidate the impact of surgical varicocele repair on the pregnancy rate through new meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials that compared surgical varicocele repair and observation. Materials and Methods: The PubMed and Embase online databases were searched for studies released before December 2012. References were manually reviewed, and two researchers independently extracted the data. To assess the quality of the studies, the Cochrane risk of bias as a quality assessment tool for randomized controlled trials was applied. Results: Seven randomized clinical trials were included in our meta-analyses, all of which compared pregnancy outcomes between surgical varicocele repair and control. There were differences in enrollment criteria among the studies. Four studies included patients with clinical varicocele, but three studies enrolled patients with subclinical varicocele. Meanwhile, four trials enrolled patients with impaired semen quality only, but the other three trials did not. In a meta-analysis of all seven trials, a forest plot using the random-effects model showed an odds ratio (OR) of 1.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 4.66; p=0.1621). However, for subanalysis of three studies that included patients with clinical varicocele and abnormal semen parameters, the fixed-effects pooled OR was significant (OR, 4.15; 95% CI, 2.31 to 7.45; p< 0.001), favoring varicocelectomy. Conclusions: Varicocelectomy for male subfertility is proven effective in men with clinical varicocele and impaired semen quality. Therefore, surgical repair should be offered as the first-line treatment of clinical varicocele in subfertile men.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 709
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Does Varicocele Repair Improve Male Infertility? An Evidence-Based Perspective From a Randomized, Controlled Trial [J].
Abdel-Meguid, Taha A. ;
Al-Sayyad, Ahmad ;
Tayib, Abdulmalik ;
Farsi, Hasan M. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (03) :455-461
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, COCHRANE DATABASESYS, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000479
[3]   Varicocele and Male Factor Infertility Treatment: A New Meta-analysis and Review of the Role of Varicocele Repair [J].
Baazeem, Abdulaziz ;
Belzile, Eric ;
Ciampi, Antonio ;
Dohle, Gert ;
Jarvi, Keith ;
Salonia, Andrea ;
Weidner, Wolfgang ;
Zini, Armand .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 60 (04) :796-808
[4]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[5]   Treatment of Palpable Varicocele in Infertile Men: A Meta-analysis to Define the Best Technique [J].
Cayan, Selahittin ;
Shavakhabov, Shavkat ;
Kadioglu, Ates .
JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 30 (01) :33-40
[6]   Current Issues in Varicocele Management: a Review [J].
Choi, Woo Suk ;
Kim, Soo Woong .
WORLD JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2013, 31 (01) :12-20
[7]   Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update [J].
DerSimonian, Rebecca ;
Kacker, Raghu .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 28 (02) :105-114
[8]   Review of current varicocelectomy techniques and their outcomes [J].
Diegidio, Paul ;
Jhaveri, Jay K. ;
Ghannam, Suzanne ;
Pinkhasov, Ruben ;
Shabsigh, Ridwan ;
Fisch, Harry .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (07) :1157-1172
[9]  
Dohle G, 2010, INT J ANDROL, V33, P29
[10]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634