Neural Mobilization: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials with an Analysis of Therapeutic Efficacy

被引:144
作者
Ellis, Richard [1 ]
Hing, Wayne [1 ]
机构
[1] AUT, Sch Physiotherapy, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1020, New Zealand
关键词
Neural Mobilization; Neurodynamics; Randomized Controlled Trial; Systematic Review; Therapeutic Efficacy;
D O I
10.1179/106698108790818594
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Neural mobilization is a treatment modality used in relation to pathologies of the nervous system. It has been suggested that neural mobilization is an effective treatment modality, although support of this suggestion is primarily anecdotal. The purpose of this paper was to provide a systematic review of the literature pertaining to the therapeutic efficacy of neural mobilization. A search to identify randomized controlled trials investigating neural mobilization was conducted using the key words neural mobilisation/mobilization, nerve mobilisation/mobilization, neural manipulative physical therapy, physical therapy, neural/nerve glide, nerve glide exercises, nerve/neural treatment, nerve/neural stretching, neurodynamics, and nerve/neural physiotherapy. The titles and abstracts of the papers identified were reviewed to select papers specifically detailing neural mobilization as a treatment modality. The PEDro scale, a systematic tool used to critique RCTs and grade methodological quality, was used to assess these trials. Methodological assessment allowed an analysis of research investigating therapeutic efficacy of neural mobilization. Ten randomized clinical trials (discussed in 11 retrieved articles) were identified that discussed the therapeutic effect of neural mobilization. This review highlights the lack in quantity and quality of the available research. Qualitative analysis of these studies revealed that there is only limited evidence to support the use of neural mobilization. Future research needs to re-examine the application of neural mobilization with use of more homogeneous study designs and pathologies; in addition, it should standardize the neural mobilization interventions used in the study.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 22
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Does pre-operative physiotherapy improve outcomes from lower limb joint replacement surgery? A systematic review [J].
Ackerman, IN ;
Bennell, KL .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2004, 50 (01) :25-30
[2]   Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome with nerve and tendon gliding exercises [J].
Akalin, E ;
El, Ö ;
Peker, Ö ;
Senocak, Ö ;
Tamci, S ;
Gülbahar, S ;
Çakmur, R ;
Öncel, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2002, 81 (02) :108-113
[3]   A randomized clinical trial of manual therapy for cervico-brachial pain syndrome - a pilot study [J].
Allison, GT ;
Nagy, BM ;
Hall, T .
MANUAL THERAPY, 2002, 7 (02) :95-102
[4]   Comparison of three conservative treatment protocols in carpal tunnel syndrome [J].
Baysal, O. ;
Altay, Z. ;
Ozcan, C. ;
Ertem, K. ;
Yologlu, S. ;
Kayhan, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 60 (07) :820-828
[5]   Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Boers, M ;
Wells, GA .
CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 14 (02) :109-114
[6]   The use of ice in the treatment of acute soft-tissue injury - A systematic review of randomized controlled trials [J].
Bleakley, C ;
McDonough, S ;
MacAuley, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (01) :251-261
[7]  
Butler D.S., 1994, GRIEVES MODERN MANUA, P693
[8]  
Butler DS, 2000, SENSITIVE NERVOUS SY
[9]  
CEBP, PEDRO SCAL
[10]   Assessing the quality of randomized trials:: Reliability of the Jadad scale [J].
Clark, HD ;
Wells, GA ;
Huët, C ;
McAlister, FA ;
Salmi, LR ;
Fergusson, D ;
Laupacis, A .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1999, 20 (05) :448-452