Conceptual Ethics II

被引:112
作者
Burgess, Alexis [1 ,3 ]
Plunkett, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Philosophy, Bldg 90, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/phc3.12085
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Which concepts should we use to think and talk about the world, and to do all of the other things that mental and linguistic representation facilitates? This is the guiding question of the field that we call 'conceptual ethics'. Conceptual ethics is not often discussed as its own systematic branch of normative theory. A case can nevertheless be made that the field is already quite active, with contributions coming in from areas as diverse as fundamental metaphysics and social/political philosophy. In this pair of papers, we try to unify the field, reflecting on its basic nature, structure, and methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:1102 / 1110
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[2]  
Anderson E., 1995, PHILOS TOPICS, V23, P27, DOI DOI 10.5840/PHILTOPICS199523213
[3]  
Burgess Alexis, OXFORD HDB TRUTH
[4]  
Burgess JP, 1997, SUBJECT NO OBJECT ST
[5]  
Davidson Arnold., 2001, EMERGENCE SEXUALITY
[6]  
Dreyfus H, 2001, BEING IN THE WORLD C
[7]   Inconsistent languages [J].
Eklund, M .
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2002, 64 (02) :251-275
[8]  
Eklund Matti, 2011, FICTIONALISM
[9]  
Field Hartry., 1991, REALISM MATH MODALIT
[10]  
Foucault M., 2002, ORDER THINGS