Machine learning for predicting the outcome of terminal ballistics events

被引:0
|
作者
Shannon Ryan [1 ]
Neeraj Mohan Sushma [1 ]
Arun Kumar AV [1 ]
Julian Berk [1 ]
Tahrima Hashem [1 ]
Santu Rana [1 ]
Svetha Venkatesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute (A~2I~2), Deakin University
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TJ01 [理论与试验];
学科分类号
0826 ;
摘要
Machine learning(ML) is well suited for the prediction of high-complexity, high-dimensional problems such as those encountered in terminal ballistics. We evaluate the performance of four popular ML-based regression models, extreme gradient boosting(XGBoost), artificial neural network(ANN), support vector regression(SVR), and Gaussian process regression(GP), on two common terminal ballistics’ problems:(a)predicting the V50ballistic limit of monolithic metallic armour impacted by small and medium calibre projectiles and fragments, and(b) predicting the depth to which a projectile will penetrate a target of semi-infinite thickness. To achieve this we utilise two datasets, each consisting of approximately 1000samples, collated from public release sources. We demonstrate that all four model types provide similarly excellent agreement when interpolating within the training data and diverge when extrapolating outside this range. Although extrapolation is not advisable for ML-based regression models, for applications such as lethality/survivability analysis, such capability is required. To circumvent this, we implement expert knowledge and physics-based models via enforced monotonicity, as a Gaussian prior mean, and through a modified loss function. The physics-informed models demonstrate improved performance over both classical physics-based models and the basic ML regression models, providing an ability to accurately fit experimental data when it is available and then revert to the physics-based model when not. The resulting models demonstrate high levels of predictive accuracy over a very wide range of projectile types, target materials and thicknesses, and impact conditions significantly more diverse than that achievable from any existing analytical approach. Compared with numerical analysis tools such as finite element solvers the ML models run orders of magnitude faster. We provide some general guidelines throughout for the development, application, and reporting of ML models in terminal ballistics problems.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 26
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Machine learning methods for predicting marine port accidents: a case study in container terminal
    Atak, Ustun
    Arslanoglu, Yasin
    SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES, 2022, 17 (11) : 2480 - 2487
  • [42] Predicting Ewing Sarcoma Treatment Outcome Using Infrared Spectroscopy and Machine Learning
    Chaber, Radoslaw
    Arthur, Christopher J.
    Lach, Kornelia
    Raciborska, Anna
    Michalak, Elzbieta
    Bilska, Katarzyna
    Drabko, Katarzyna
    Depciuch, Joanna
    Kaznowska, Ewa
    Cebulski, Jozef
    MOLECULES, 2019, 24 (06)
  • [43] PREDICTING THE PROBABILITY OF OUTCOME IN BREAST CANCER - A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MACHINE LEARNING METHODS
    Al-allak, A.
    Leonard, R.
    Lewis, P.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 8 (06): : 26 - 26
  • [44] Predicting the Outcome of Construction Change Disputes Using Machine-Learning Algorithms
    Alqaisi, Aaraf Shukur
    Ataei, Hossein
    Seyrfar, Abolfazl
    Al Omari, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [45] Machine Learning Approaches to Determine Feature Importance for Predicting Infant Autopsy Outcome
    Booth, John
    Margetts, Ben
    Bryant, Will
    Issitt, Richard
    Hutchinson, Ciaran
    Martin, Nigel
    Sebire, Neil J.
    PEDIATRIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2021, 24 (04) : 351 - 360
  • [46] What drives performance in machine learning models for predicting heart failure outcome?
    Gutman, Rom
    Aronson, Doron
    Caspi, Oren
    Shalit, Uri
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL - DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 4 (03): : 175 - 187
  • [47] Use of machine learning for predicting levetiracetam treatment outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy
    Ricci, L.
    Croce, P.
    Pulitano, P.
    Boscarino, M.
    Zappasodi, F.
    Lanzone, J.
    Narducci, F.
    Mecarelli, O.
    Di Lazzaro, V.
    Tombini, M.
    Assenza, G.
    EPILEPSIA, 2022, 63 : 66 - 66
  • [48] Terminal ballistics of high velocity missiles
    Hancevic, J
    Korac, Z
    Kelenc, D
    Hraste, A
    Kukolj, M
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM, 2002, 104 (03) : 321 - 330
  • [49] EFFECTS OF EFP SOLIDITY IN TERMINAL BALLISTICS
    Kim, H. S.
    Arnold, W.
    Hartmann, T.
    Rottenkolber, E.
    Klavzar, A.
    BALLISTICS 2011: 26TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BALLISTICS, VOL 1 AND VOL 2, 2011, : 1429 - 1436
  • [50] Predicting Terrorism with Machine Learning: Lessons from "Predicting Terrorism: A Machine Learning Approach"
    Basuchoudhary, Atin
    Bang, James T.
    PEACE ECONOMICS PEACE SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2018, 24 (04)