Machine learning for predicting the outcome of terminal ballistics events

被引:0
|
作者
Shannon Ryan [1 ]
Neeraj Mohan Sushma [1 ]
Arun Kumar AV [1 ]
Julian Berk [1 ]
Tahrima Hashem [1 ]
Santu Rana [1 ]
Svetha Venkatesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute (A~2I~2), Deakin University
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TJ01 [理论与试验];
学科分类号
0826 ;
摘要
Machine learning(ML) is well suited for the prediction of high-complexity, high-dimensional problems such as those encountered in terminal ballistics. We evaluate the performance of four popular ML-based regression models, extreme gradient boosting(XGBoost), artificial neural network(ANN), support vector regression(SVR), and Gaussian process regression(GP), on two common terminal ballistics’ problems:(a)predicting the V50ballistic limit of monolithic metallic armour impacted by small and medium calibre projectiles and fragments, and(b) predicting the depth to which a projectile will penetrate a target of semi-infinite thickness. To achieve this we utilise two datasets, each consisting of approximately 1000samples, collated from public release sources. We demonstrate that all four model types provide similarly excellent agreement when interpolating within the training data and diverge when extrapolating outside this range. Although extrapolation is not advisable for ML-based regression models, for applications such as lethality/survivability analysis, such capability is required. To circumvent this, we implement expert knowledge and physics-based models via enforced monotonicity, as a Gaussian prior mean, and through a modified loss function. The physics-informed models demonstrate improved performance over both classical physics-based models and the basic ML regression models, providing an ability to accurately fit experimental data when it is available and then revert to the physics-based model when not. The resulting models demonstrate high levels of predictive accuracy over a very wide range of projectile types, target materials and thicknesses, and impact conditions significantly more diverse than that achievable from any existing analytical approach. Compared with numerical analysis tools such as finite element solvers the ML models run orders of magnitude faster. We provide some general guidelines throughout for the development, application, and reporting of ML models in terminal ballistics problems.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 26
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COULD MACHINE LEARNING (ML) IMPROVE INDICES FOR PREDICTING OUTCOME OF AUGIB?
    Nigam, Gaurav
    Thakur, A.
    Dhiman, P.
    Oakland, K.
    Grant-Casey, J.
    Douds, A.
    Jairath, V.
    Clifton, D.
    Murphy, M.
    Stanley, A.
    Travis, S.
    GUT, 2021, 70 : A40 - A40
  • [32] Predicting the Outcome of English Premier League Matches using Machine Learning
    Raju, Muntaqim Ahmed
    Mia, Md Solaiman
    Abu Sayed, Md
    Uddin, Md Riaz
    2020 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES FOR INDUSTRY 4.0 (STI), 2020,
  • [33] Predicting Refractive Surgery Outcome: Machine Learning Approach With Big Data
    Achiron, Asaf
    Gur, Zvi
    Aviv, Uri
    Hilely, Assaf
    Mimouni, Michael
    Karmona, Lily
    Rokach, Lior
    Kaiserman, Igor
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 33 (09) : 592 - 597
  • [35] Predicting adverse pregnancy outcome in Rwanda using machine learning techniques
    Kubahoniyesu, Theogene
    Kabano, Ignace Habimana
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (12):
  • [36] The Mechanochemistry of Damage and Terminal Ballistics
    Bjerke, Todd
    Greenfield, Michael
    Segletes, Steven
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 HYPERVELOCITY IMPACT SYMPOSIUM (HVIS 2015), 2015, 103 : 35 - 42
  • [37] Events and Machine Learning
    Hebblewhite, Augustus
    Hohwy, Jakob
    Drummond, Tom
    TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (01) : 243 - 247
  • [38] Machine learning approaches for predicting the onset time of the adverse drug events in oncology
    Timilsina, Mohan
    Tandan, Meera
    Novacek, Vit
    MACHINE LEARNING WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 9
  • [39] A systematic review of machine learning applications in predicting opioid associated adverse events
    Medina, Carlos R. Ramirez
    Benitez-Aurioles, Jose
    Jenkins, David A.
    Jani, Meghna
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2025, 8 (01):
  • [40] Predicting the Airspace Capacity of Terminal Area under Convective Weather Using Machine Learning
    Wang, Shijin
    Yang, Baotian
    Duan, Rongrong
    Li, Jiahao
    AEROSPACE, 2023, 10 (03)