Machine learning for predicting the outcome of terminal ballistics events

被引:0
|
作者
Shannon Ryan [1 ]
Neeraj Mohan Sushma [1 ]
Arun Kumar AV [1 ]
Julian Berk [1 ]
Tahrima Hashem [1 ]
Santu Rana [1 ]
Svetha Venkatesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute (A~2I~2), Deakin University
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TJ01 [理论与试验];
学科分类号
0826 ;
摘要
Machine learning(ML) is well suited for the prediction of high-complexity, high-dimensional problems such as those encountered in terminal ballistics. We evaluate the performance of four popular ML-based regression models, extreme gradient boosting(XGBoost), artificial neural network(ANN), support vector regression(SVR), and Gaussian process regression(GP), on two common terminal ballistics’ problems:(a)predicting the V50ballistic limit of monolithic metallic armour impacted by small and medium calibre projectiles and fragments, and(b) predicting the depth to which a projectile will penetrate a target of semi-infinite thickness. To achieve this we utilise two datasets, each consisting of approximately 1000samples, collated from public release sources. We demonstrate that all four model types provide similarly excellent agreement when interpolating within the training data and diverge when extrapolating outside this range. Although extrapolation is not advisable for ML-based regression models, for applications such as lethality/survivability analysis, such capability is required. To circumvent this, we implement expert knowledge and physics-based models via enforced monotonicity, as a Gaussian prior mean, and through a modified loss function. The physics-informed models demonstrate improved performance over both classical physics-based models and the basic ML regression models, providing an ability to accurately fit experimental data when it is available and then revert to the physics-based model when not. The resulting models demonstrate high levels of predictive accuracy over a very wide range of projectile types, target materials and thicknesses, and impact conditions significantly more diverse than that achievable from any existing analytical approach. Compared with numerical analysis tools such as finite element solvers the ML models run orders of magnitude faster. We provide some general guidelines throughout for the development, application, and reporting of ML models in terminal ballistics problems.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 26
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predicting adverse drug events in older inpatients: a machine learning study
    Qiaozhi Hu
    Bin Wu
    Jinhui Wu
    Ting Xu
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2022, 44 : 1304 - 1311
  • [22] Machine learning for predicting cardiac events: what does the future hold?
    Patel, Brijesh
    Sengupta, Partho
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2020, 18 (02) : 77 - 84
  • [23] Predicting adverse drug events in older inpatients: a machine learning study
    Hu, Qiaozhi
    Wu, Bin
    Wu, Jinhui
    Xu, Ting
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2022, 44 (06) : 1304 - 1311
  • [24] Predicting the Outcome of Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Using Machine Learning Techniques
    de Toledo, Paula
    Rios, Pablo M.
    Ledezma, Agapito
    Sanchis, Araceli
    Alen, Jose F.
    Lagares, Alfonso
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN BIOMEDICINE, 2009, 13 (05): : 794 - 801
  • [25] Predicting mutant outcome by combining deep mutational scanning and machine learning
    Sarfati, Hagit
    Naftaly, Si
    Papo, Niv
    Keasar, Chen
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 90 (01) : 45 - 57
  • [26] Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Type and Outcome of Ureteral Stones Treatments
    Rashidi, Elahe
    Langarizadeh, Mostafa
    Sayadi, Mohammadjavad
    Sarkarian, Mohsen
    ADVANCED BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (01): : 234
  • [27] Predicting Health Outcome from Purchasing History Using Machine Learning
    Illanko, Kandasamy
    Fernando, Xavier
    IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS (ICC 2021), 2021,
  • [28] Predicting the Outcome of Soccer Matches using Machine Learning and Statistical Analysis
    Elmiligi, Haytham
    Saad, Sherif
    2022 IEEE 12TH ANNUAL COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION WORKSHOP AND CONFERENCE (CCWC), 2022, : 50 - 57
  • [29] Predicting Outcome of Traumatic Brain Injury: Is Machine Learning the Best Way?
    Bruschetta, Roberta
    Tartarisco, Gennaro
    Lucca, Lucia Francesca
    Leto, Elio
    Ursino, Maria
    Tonin, Paolo
    Pioggia, Giovanni
    Cerasa, Antonio
    BIOMEDICINES, 2022, 10 (03)
  • [30] Race Matching in Predicting Relational Therapy Outcome: a Machine Learning Approach
    Hung, Yi-Hsin
    Linville, Deanna
    Janes, Emily
    Yee, Simon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMIC THERAPY, 2023, 34 (02): : 83 - 94