Machine learning for predicting the outcome of terminal ballistics events

被引:0
|
作者
Shannon Ryan [1 ]
Neeraj Mohan Sushma [1 ]
Arun Kumar AV [1 ]
Julian Berk [1 ]
Tahrima Hashem [1 ]
Santu Rana [1 ]
Svetha Venkatesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute (A~2I~2), Deakin University
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TJ01 [理论与试验];
学科分类号
0826 ;
摘要
Machine learning(ML) is well suited for the prediction of high-complexity, high-dimensional problems such as those encountered in terminal ballistics. We evaluate the performance of four popular ML-based regression models, extreme gradient boosting(XGBoost), artificial neural network(ANN), support vector regression(SVR), and Gaussian process regression(GP), on two common terminal ballistics’ problems:(a)predicting the V50ballistic limit of monolithic metallic armour impacted by small and medium calibre projectiles and fragments, and(b) predicting the depth to which a projectile will penetrate a target of semi-infinite thickness. To achieve this we utilise two datasets, each consisting of approximately 1000samples, collated from public release sources. We demonstrate that all four model types provide similarly excellent agreement when interpolating within the training data and diverge when extrapolating outside this range. Although extrapolation is not advisable for ML-based regression models, for applications such as lethality/survivability analysis, such capability is required. To circumvent this, we implement expert knowledge and physics-based models via enforced monotonicity, as a Gaussian prior mean, and through a modified loss function. The physics-informed models demonstrate improved performance over both classical physics-based models and the basic ML regression models, providing an ability to accurately fit experimental data when it is available and then revert to the physics-based model when not. The resulting models demonstrate high levels of predictive accuracy over a very wide range of projectile types, target materials and thicknesses, and impact conditions significantly more diverse than that achievable from any existing analytical approach. Compared with numerical analysis tools such as finite element solvers the ML models run orders of magnitude faster. We provide some general guidelines throughout for the development, application, and reporting of ML models in terminal ballistics problems.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 26
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine learning for predicting the outcome of terminal ballistics events
    Ryan, Shannon
    Sushma, Neeraj Mohan
    Kumar, A. V. Arun
    Berk, Julian
    Hashem, Tahrima
    Rana, Santu
    Venkatesh, Svetha
    DEFENCE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 31 : 14 - 26
  • [2] Machine learning methods for predicting the outcome of hypervelocity impact events
    Ryan, Shannon
    Thaler, Stephen
    Kandanaarachchi, Sevvandi
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2016, 45 : 23 - 39
  • [3] Predicting anesthetic infusion events using machine learning
    Miyaguchi, Naoki
    Takeuchi, Koh
    Kashima, Hisashi
    Morita, Mizuki
    Morimatsu, Hiroshi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [4] Predicting anesthetic infusion events using machine learning
    Naoki Miyaguchi
    Koh Takeuchi
    Hisashi Kashima
    Mizuki Morita
    Hiroshi Morimatsu
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [5] TERMINAL BALLISTICS
    STEINHARDT, J
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONS RESEARCH SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1955, 3 (03): : 231 - 238
  • [6] Predicting bloodstream infection outcome using machine learning
    Zoabi, Yazeed
    Kehat, Orli
    Lahav, Dan
    Weiss-Meilik, Ahuva
    Adler, Amos
    Shomron, Noam
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [7] Predicting the Outcome of Lung Transplantation Using Machine Learning
    Chaudhari, P. A.
    Hamedani, H.
    Pourfathi, M.
    Sertic, F.
    Richards, T. J.
    Kdlecek, S.
    Rizi, R. R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 203 (09)
  • [8] Machine learning approach to predicting a basketball game outcome
    Alonso, Roger Poch
    Babac, Marina Bagić
    International Journal of Data Science, 2022, 7 (01) : 60 - 77
  • [9] Predicting bloodstream infection outcome using machine learning
    Yazeed Zoabi
    Orli Kehat
    Dan Lahav
    Ahuva Weiss-Meilik
    Amos Adler
    Noam Shomron
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [10] Predicting Terminal Ballistics using an Iterative Application of an Artificial Neural Network
    Auten, John R., Sr.
    Hammell, Robert J., II
    2017 COMPUTING CONFERENCE, 2017, : 706 - 715