Computer-Aided Histopathological Image Analysis Techniques for Automated Nuclear Atypia Scoring of Breast Cancer: a Review

被引:0
作者
Asha Das
Madhu S. Nair
S. David Peter
机构
[1] Cochin University of Science and Technology,Artificial Intelligence & Computer Vision Lab, Department of Computer Science
来源
Journal of Digital Imaging | 2020年 / 33卷
关键词
Nuclear pleomorphism; Nuclear atypia scoring; Breast cancer; Histopathological image analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Breast cancer is the most common type of malignancy diagnosed in women. Through early detection and diagnosis, there is a great chance of recovery and thereby reduce the mortality rate. Many preliminary tests like non-invasive radiological diagnosis using ultrasound, mammography, and MRI are widely used for the diagnosis of breast cancer. However, histopathological analysis of breast biopsy specimen is inevitable and is considered to be the golden standard for the affirmation of cancer. With the advancements in the digital computing capabilities, memory capacity, and imaging modalities, the development of computer-aided powerful analytical techniques for histopathological data has increased dramatically. These automated techniques help to alleviate the laborious work of the pathologist and to improve the reproducibility and reliability of the interpretation. This paper reviews and summarizes digital image computational algorithms applied on histopathological breast cancer images for nuclear atypia scoring and explores the future possibilities. The algorithms for nuclear pleomorphism scoring of breast cancer can be widely grouped into two categories: handcrafted feature-based and learned feature-based. Handcrafted feature-based algorithms mainly include the computational steps like pre-processing the images, segmenting the nuclei, extracting unique features, feature selection, and machine learning–based classification. However, most of the recent algorithms are based on learned features, that extract high-level abstractions directly from the histopathological images utilizing deep learning techniques. In this paper, we discuss the various algorithms applied for the nuclear pleomorphism scoring of breast cancer, discourse the challenges to be dealt with, and outline the importance of benchmark datasets. A comparative analysis of some prominent works on breast cancer nuclear atypia scoring is done using a benchmark dataset which enables to quantitatively measure and compare the different features and algorithms used for breast cancer grading. Results show that improvements are still required, to have an automated cancer grading system suitable for clinical applications.
引用
收藏
页码:1091 / 1121
页数:30
相关论文
共 207 条
  • [1] Bardou D(2018)Classification of breast cancer based on histology images using convolutional neural networks IEEE Access 6 24,680-24,693
  • [2] Zhang K(2013)Multi-field-of-view framework for distinguishing tumor grade in ER+ breast cancer from entire histopathology slides IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 60 2089-2099
  • [3] Ahmad SM(2016)Automatic segmentation of cell nuclei using Krill Herd optimization based multi-thresholding and Localized Active Contour Model Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering 36 584-596
  • [4] Basavanhally A(2017)Context-aware stacked convolutional neural networks for classification of breast carcinomas in whole-slide histopathology images Journal of Medical Imaging 4 044,504-1386
  • [5] Ganesan S(1987)The importance of histologic grade in long-term prognosis of breast cancer: a study of 1,010 patients, uniformly treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 5 1378-1260
  • [6] Feldman M(2019)Sparse representation over learned dictionaries on the riemannian manifold for automated grading of nuclear pleomorphism in breast cancer IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 28 1248-46
  • [7] Shih N(2008)Sparse directional image representations using the discrete shearlet transform Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis 25 25-874
  • [8] Mies C(2015)Diagnostic Concordance Among Pathologists Interpreting Breast Biopsy Specimens JAMA 313 1122-2323
  • [9] Tomaszewski J(2006)An introduction to ROC analysis Pattern Recognition Letters 27 861-24
  • [10] Madabhushi A(2015)Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013 The Lancet 386 2287-576