Determinants of outflow rate through the ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy: an experimental in vivo study in an anesthetized porcine model

被引:0
|
作者
Gabriel Faria-Costa
Arman Tsaturyan
Angelis Peteinaris
Solon Faitatziadis
Evangelos Liatsikos
Panagiotis Kallidonis
机构
[1] Unidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos,Department of Urology
[2] Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto,Department of Surgery and Physiology
[3] University of Patras Medical School,Department of Urology
[4] Medical University of Vienna,Department of Urology
[5] Sechenov University,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health
来源
Urolithiasis | / 51卷
关键词
Flexible ureteroscopy; Outflow; Ureteral access sheath; Lower calyx;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To evaluate the effect of different ureteroscope positions, saline pumping frequency, laser fiber diameter and ureteral access sheath (UAS) on outflow rate during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). This study was performed in an anesthetized porcine model. The fURS setup included a manual pumping system, a 9.5 Fr single used-digital flexible ureteroscope and a ureteral access sheath (UAS). Outflow was collected and measured from the UAS during 1 min in all experimental settings. The evaluated variables were the position of the ureteroscope, the pumping frequency (2 s, 3 s or 5 s), the diameter of the used UAS (12/14 Fr or 14/16 Fr) and laser fiber (200 μm or a 272 μm). Ureteroscope position in the lower calyx was associated with significantly lower outflow rate (p < 0.05). The use of the 14/16 Fr UAS resulted in improved flow in the renal pelvis and upper calyx (p < 0.05) but not in the lower calyx. The use of a 200 μm laser fiber only improved flow in the upper calyx and when a 14/16 Fr UAS was being used. Pumping frequency did not show a significant correlation with outflow rate. The ureteroscope positioning and UAS size were important determinants of outflow rate through the UAS during fURS, while laser fiber diameter had a limited effect. In the lower calyx the outflow was minimal and was not improved by using a larger UAS.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Determinants of outflow rate through the ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy: an experimental in vivo study in an anesthetized porcine model
    Faria-Costa, Gabriel
    Tsaturyan, Arman
    Peteinaris, Angelis
    Faitatziadis, Solon
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    UROLITHIASIS, 2022, 51 (01)
  • [2] Comparison of suctioning and traditional ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones
    Zewu Zhu
    Yu Cui
    Feng Zeng
    Yang Li
    Zhiyong Chen
    Chen Hequn
    World Journal of Urology, 2019, 37 : 921 - 929
  • [3] Comparison of suctioning and traditional ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones
    Zhu, Zewu
    Cui, Yu
    Zeng, Feng
    Li, Yang
    Chen, Zhiyong
    Chen Hequn
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (05) : 921 - 929
  • [4] Flexible ureteroscopy with and without ureteral access sheath in treatment of large renal stones: a randomized controlled study
    Abdelrasol, Waheed Fawzy
    Assem, Ahmed
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 30 (01)
  • [5] Intrarenal pressure study using 7.5 French flexible ureteroscope with or without ureteral access sheath in an ex-vivo porcine kidney model
    Han, Zhenyuan
    Wang, Baosen
    Liu, Xiaohui
    Jing, Tao
    Yue, WenSu
    Wang, Yuliang
    Wang, Dong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (11) : 3129 - 3134
  • [6] Intrarenal pressure study using 7.5 French flexible ureteroscope with or without ureteral access sheath in an ex-vivo porcine kidney model
    Zhenyuan Han
    Baosen Wang
    Xiaohui Liu
    Tao Jing
    WenSu Yue
    Yuliang Wang
    Dong Wang
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 3129 - 3134
  • [7] The efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy for large volume stones and hazards of ureteral access sheath usage: A prospective randomized study
    Rammah, Ahmed M.
    Khaled, Farouk
    Zamel, Samih
    Elkady, Amr
    Morsy, Samer
    Abdelwahab, Mohamed
    ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2025, 23 (01) : 62 - 69
  • [8] Comparison between flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath and standard ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy for the management of kidney stone: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ibrahim Alnadhari
    Osama Abdeljaleel
    Omar Ali
    Ahmad Shamsodini
    Abdulla Al-Ansari
    Morshed Salah
    BMC Urology, 25 (1)
  • [9] Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy with flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for the treatment of impacted upper ureteral stones: a retrospective study
    Tang, Haiyang
    Che, Yulong
    Wu, Zhanpeng
    Yuan, Fangchao
    Liu, Jiayu
    Li, Jie
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2025, 12
  • [10] The outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy for renal calculi of 2 cm or more with and without the use of ureteral access sheath: A retrospective study
    Fathi, Basem A.
    Elgammal, Ahmed A.
    Abouelgreed, Tamer A.
    Ghoneimy, Osama M.
    Aboelsaad, Ahmed Y.
    Alhefnawy, Mohamed A.
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2023, 95 (03)