Gender gaps in international research collaboration: a bibliometric approach

被引:0
作者
Dag W. Aksnes
Fredrik Niclas Piro
Kristoffer Rørstad
机构
[1] Research and Education (NIFU),Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation
来源
Scientometrics | 2019年 / 120卷
关键词
Gender inequality; Science policy; Research productivity; Bibliometrics; International research collaboration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper addresses gender differences in international research collaboration measured through international co-authorship. The study is based on a dataset consisting of 5600 Norwegian researchers and their publication output during a 3-year period (44,000 publications). Two different indicators are calculated. First, the share of researchers that have been involved in international collaboration as measured by co-authorship, and second, the share of their publications with international co-authorship. The study shows that the field of research is by far the most important factor influencing the propensity to collaborate internationally. There are large differences from humanities on the one hand, where international collaboration in terms of co-authorship is less common, to the natural sciences on the other, where such collaboration is very frequent. On an overall level, we find distinct gender differences in international research collaboration in Norway in the favour of men. However, men and women are not equally distributed across fields and there are relatively more female researchers in fields where the international collaboration rates generally are lower. When the data are analysed by scientific field, academic position, and publication productivity of the researchers, the gender differences in the propensity to collaborate with colleagues in other countries are minor only, and not statistically significant. Concerning gender inequality in science, the main challenge seems to be the lower productivity level of female researchers, which obviously hinders their academic career development. Differences in international collaboration are unlikely to be an important factor in this respect, at least not in the Norwegian research context analysed in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 774
页数:27
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Abramo G(2009)Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation? Higher Education 57 155-171
  • [2] D’Angelo CA(2013)Gender differences in research collaboration Journal of Informetrics 7 811-822
  • [3] Di Costa F(2011)The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research Scientometrics 86 629-643
  • [4] Abramo G(2012)Collaborations: The rise of research networks Nature 490 335-336
  • [5] D’Angelo CA(2008)Science policy and the driving forces behind the internationalisation of science: The case of Norway Science and Public Policy 35 445-457
  • [6] Murgia G(2011)Are female researchers less cited? A large scale study of Norwegian researchers Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62 628-636
  • [7] Abramo G(2019)A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of Scopus and Web of Science Journal of Data and Information Science 4 1-21
  • [8] D’Angelo CA(2007)Is team formation gender neutral? Evidence from coauthorship patterns Journal of Labor Economics 25 325-365
  • [9] Solazzi M(2011)How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers Research Policy 40 1393-1402
  • [10] Adams J(2016)Is there a gender difference in scientific collaboration? A scientometric examination of co-authorships among industrial-organizational psychologists Scientometrics 108 113-141