A computable general equilibrium analysis of environmental tax reform in Japan with a forward-looking dynamic model

被引:2
作者
Shiro Takeda
Toshi H. Arimura
机构
[1] Kyoto Sangyo University,
[2] Waseda University,undefined
来源
Sustainability Science | 2021年 / 16卷
关键词
Carbon tax; Environmental tax reform; Double dividend; Computable general equilibrium; Climate change; Tax interaction effects; Paris agreement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Japanese government plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by 2050. However, it is not yet clear which policy measures the government will adopt to achieve this goal. In this regard, environmental tax reform, which is the combination of carbon regulation and the reduction of existing distortionary taxes, has attracted much attention. This paper examines the effects of an environmental tax reform in Japan. Using a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model, we analyze the quantitative impacts of an environmental tax reform and clarify which types of environmental tax reform are the most desirable. In the simulation, we introduce a carbon tax and consider the following four scenarios for the use of the carbon tax revenue: (1) a lump-sum rebate to the household, (2) a cut in income taxes, (3) a cut in corporate taxes and (4) a cut in consumption taxes. The first scenario is a pure carbon tax, and the other three scenarios are types of environmental tax reform. Our CGE simulation shows that (1) environmental tax reform tends to generate more desirable impacts than the pure carbon tax and that (2) the strong double dividend is obtained in some cases. In particular, we show that a cut in corporate taxes leads to the most desirable policy in terms of GDP and national income.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 521
页数:18
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Arimura TH(2020)The impact of the Tokyo emissions trading scheme on office buildings: what factor contributed to the emission reduction? Environ Econ Policy Stud 64 41-53
[2]  
Abe T(2019)Political economy of voluntary approaches: a lesson from environmental policies in Japan Econ Anal Policy 6 55-75
[3]  
Arimura TH(1976)The design of tax structure: direct versus indirect taxation J Pub Econ 26 1341-1354
[4]  
Kaneko S(2009)Forward-looking versus recursive-dynamic modeling in climate policy analysis: a comparison Econ Model 21 375-413
[5]  
Managi S(1999)Global impacts of the kyoto agreement: results from the MS-MRT model Resou Energy Econ 12 137-150
[6]  
Shinkuma T(1998)Consequences of environmental tax reform for unemployment and welfare Environ Resour Econ 2 157-183
[7]  
Yamamoto M(2017)Environmental taxation and the double dividend hypothesis in CGE modelling literature: a critical review J Pol Model 26 577-609
[8]  
Yoshida Y(1995)Environmental taxation and the `Double Dividend’: a reader’s guide Int Tax Public Fin 93 110-118
[9]  
Atkinson AB(2020)Impact of the Saitama Prefecture target-setting emissions trading program on the adoption of low-carbon technology Environ Econ Policy Stud 33 S34-S40
[10]  
Stiglitz JE(2002)Approximating infinite-horizon models in a complementarity format: a primer in dynamic general equilibrium analysis J Econ Dyn Control 3 31-42