Assessing willingness to pay for cancer prevention

被引:0
作者
Michael A. Milligan
Alok K. Bohara
José A. Pagán
机构
[1] University of New Mexico,Department of Economics
[2] Pusan National University,Department of Global Studies
[3] University of North Texas Health Science Center,Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health
[4] University of Pennsylvania,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
来源
International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics | 2010年 / 10卷
关键词
Willingness to pay; Cancer; Prevention; I10;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the U.S. and its economic cost is very high. The objective of this study is to analyze the socioeconomic and demographic factors that are related to the willingness to pay (WTP) for cancer prevention. Data from an experimental module in the 2002 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) were used to identify WTP differences across different population subgroups. Respondents were asked whether they were willing and able to pay different dollar amounts per month for a new cancer prevention drug. Years of age were negatively related to WTP whereas income and the probability of developing cancer were positively related to WTP. Risk-relevant numeracy skills were positively related to self-assessed cancer risk, which may suggest that adults with poor numeracy skills underestimate their cancer risk. This has consequences not only on the relative perceived value of different cancer treatments across different population subgroups but also on perceived value as captured by WTP.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 314
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Bateman I. J.(2001)Bound and path effects in double and triple bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation Resource and Energy Economics 23 191-213
[2]  
Langford I. H.(1988)A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: Maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15 355-379
[3]  
Jones A. P.(1998)Health care contingent valuation studies: A review and classification of the literature Health Economics 7 313-326
[4]  
Kerr G. N.(2001)Willingness-to-pay for colorectal cancer screening European Journal of Cancer 37 1746-1751
[5]  
Cameron T. A.(1991)Statistical efficiency of double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 1255-1263
[6]  
Diener A.(2006)Evidence on preferences and subjective beliefs of risk takers: The case of smokers International Journal of Industrial Organization 24 667-682
[7]  
O’Brien B.(1999)The contingent valuation method in health care Health Policy 47 97-123
[8]  
Gafni A.(2002)Age, health and willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: A contingent valuation study of Ontario residents Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 24 161-186
[9]  
Frew E.(2009)An empiric estimate of the value of life: Updating the dialysis cost-effectiveness standard Value in Health 12 80-87
[10]  
Wolstenholme J. L.(1998)Assessing the value of a new pharmaceutical: A feasibility study of contingent valuation in managed care Medical Care 36 370-384