Trust game, survey trust, are they correlated? Evidence from China

被引:0
作者
Yujie Tang
Zhe Gong
机构
[1] Sichuan Normal University,College of Psychology
[2] Key Laboratory of Psychology and Behavior of Discipline Inspection and Supervision,Sichuan Key Laboratory of Philosophy and Social Sciences
来源
Current Psychology | 2024年 / 43卷
关键词
Trust Game; Survey; In-group trust; Out-group trust; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Trust Game and survey trust are the two most popular measurements in the field of trust research, but most studies conducted in developing countries have found low or even insignificant correlations between them, we therefore validated this phenomenon in the cultural context of the largest developing country, China. Within-country differences can be of the same magnitude as the between country differences, especially in a culturally diverse China. Thus, we focus on comparing the characteristics of trust in the South and North regions of China. Through zero-order correlation and hierarchical regression analysis, our findings are consistent with those of numerous developing countries: Trust Game is lowly correlated with in-group trust survey and not with out-group trust survey. On the other hand, we found that Chinese individuals exhibit a distinct pattern of in-group trust, and there is no fundamental difference in the characteristics of trust between the South and the North.
引用
收藏
页码:2253 / 2263
页数:10
相关论文
共 202 条
  • [1] Abascal M(2015)Love thy neighbor? Ethnoracial diversity and trust reexamined American Journal of Sociology 121 722-782
  • [2] Baldassarri D(2019)Personal trust extends cooperation beyond trustees: a mexican study International Journal of Psychology 54 687-704
  • [3] Acedo-Carmona C(2018)Measuring trust: a reinvestigation Southern Economic Journal 84 992-1000
  • [4] Gomila A(2019)Belief-dependent preferences and reputation: experimental analysis of a repeated trust game Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 167 341-360
  • [5] Aksoy B(2019)Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 19 165-176
  • [6] Harwell H(1995)Trust, reciprocity, and social history Games and Economic Behavior 10 122-142
  • [7] Kovaliukaite A(2018)The prevalence and the increasing significance of guanxi The China Quarterly 235 597-621
  • [8] Eckel C(2012)East Asia remains different: a comment on the index of “self-expression values,” by Inglehart and Welzel Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 43 373-383
  • [9] Attanasi G(2004)The boundaries of trust: own and others’ actions in the US and China Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 55 485-504
  • [10] Battigalli P(2018)More or less guanxi: Trust is 60% network context, 10% individual difference Social Networks 54 12-25