Games of Competition in a Stochastic Environment

被引:0
作者
Judith Avrahami
Werner Güth
Yaakov Kareev
机构
[1] The Hebrew University of Jerusalem,Center for the Study of Rationality, and The Goldie Rotman Center for Cognitive Science and Education
[2] Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems,undefined
来源
Theory and Decision | 2005年 / 59卷
关键词
equilibrium; impulse balance; maximin behavior; probability matching; reinforcement learning; species competition; stochastic zero-sum games;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The paper presents a set of games of competition between two or three players in which reward is jointly determined by a stochastic biased mechanism and players’ choices. More specifically, a resource can be found with unequal probabilities in one of two locations. The first agent is rewarded only if it finds the resource and avoids being found by the next agent in line; the latter is rewarded only if it finds the former. Five benchmarks, based on different psychological and game-theoretic assumptions are derived and their predictions compared to actual behavior of 120, 40, and 48 participants playing repeatedly. Of the five benchmarks—the unique (Nash) equilibrium, reinforcement learning, trust-based efficiency, maximum unpredictability, and regret-based (Impulse Balance) equilibrium—regret for missed opportunities best accounts for the qualitative aspect of participants’ behavior and regret attenuated by randomization best accounts for the quantitative aspect of behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 294
页数:39
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Avrahami J.(2001)Predating predators Homo Economicus 18 337-351
  • [2] Güth W.(1992)Evolution and market behavior Journal of Economic Theory 58 9-40
  • [3] Kareev Y.(1998)EWA learning in coordination games: probability rules, heterogeneity, and time-variation Journal of Mathematical Psychology 42 305-326
  • [4] Blume L.E.(2001)An experimental test of a predator-prey model of appropriation Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 45 83-97
  • [5] Easley D.(1961)A descriptive approach to the dynamics of choice behavior Behavioral Science 6 177-184
  • [6] Camerer C.(1976)The cognitive side of probability learning Psychological Review 83 37-64
  • [7] Ho T.H.(1997)What makes markets allocationally efficient? Quarterly Journal of Economics CXII 603-630
  • [8] Carter J.T.(2005)An explanation of anomalous behavior in models of political participation American Political Science Review 99 201-213
  • [9] Anderton C.H.(1995)Swords or plowshares? A theory of the security of claims to property Journal of Political Economy 103 1275-1288
  • [10] Estes W.K.(2005)How to play randomly without random generator – The case of maximin players Homo Oeconomicus 22 231-256