Co-creation of a patient engagement strategy in cancer research funding

被引:3
|
作者
Taccone M.S. [1 ]
Baudais N. [2 ]
Wood D. [2 ]
Bays S. [2 ]
Frost S. [2 ]
Urquhart R. [3 ]
Graham I.D. [4 ,5 ]
Takacs J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Childhood Cancer Survivor Canada, Toronto, ON
[2] Canadian Cancer Society, 55 St Clair Ave W Suite 500, Toronto, M4V 2Y7, ON
[3] Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
[4] Schools of Epidemiology and Public Health & Nursing, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, K1G 5Z3, ON
[5] Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 241, Ottawa, K1H 8L6, ON
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Co-creation; Patient engagement; Research funding; Strategy development;
D O I
10.1186/s40900-023-00501-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: As research teams, networks, and institutes, and health, medical, and scientific communities begin to build consensus on the benefits of patient engagement in cancer research, research funders are increasingly looking to meaningfully incorporate patient partnership within funding processes and research requirements. The Canadian Cancer Society (CCS), the largest non-profit cancer research funder in Canada, set out to co-create a patient engagement in cancer research strategy with patients, survivors, caregivers and researchers. The goal of this strategy was to meaningfully and systematically engage with patients in research funding and research activities. Methods: A team of four patient partners with diverse cancer and personal experiences, and two researchers at different career stages agreed to participate as members of the strategy team. Ten staff members participated in supportive roles and to give context regarding different departments of CCS. The strategy was co-developed in 2021/2022 over a series of 7 workshops using facilitation strategies such as ground rules and consensus building, and methods such as Design Thinking. The strategy was subjected to 3 rounds of validation. Results: The co-creation and validation process resulted in a multi-faceted strategy with actionable sections, including vision, guiding principles, engagement methods, 13 prioritized engagement activities spanning the spectrum of research funding, and an evaluation framework. The experience of co-creating the strategy was captured using the Patient and Public Engagement Evaluation Tool and revealed a positive, supportive experience. Conclusions: Lessons learned included the value of an emphasis on a co-creation process from day one, the utility of facilitation techniques such as ground rules for dialogue, consensus building and Design Thinking, and the importance (and challenge) of designing for and incorporating equity when drafting the strategy. Future work will include implementation and evaluation of the strategy, as well as an examination of further ways to meaningfully and systematically engage diverse voices in research and research funding. © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integration of Customer to the Innovation Process; the Engagement of a Community Network in Approach of Co-creation
    Pellat, Ghislaine
    Peyroux, Catherine
    POUR UNE EUROPE FORTE, RENOVER LES STRUCTURES ECONOMIQUES, ENTREPRENEURIALES, POLITIQUES, TERRITORIALES ET EDUCATIVES, 2016, : 47 - 57
  • [32] Situational and personal factors influencing hospitality employee engagement in value co-creation
    Chathoth, Prakash K.
    Harrington, Robert J.
    Chan, Eric S. W.
    Okumus, Fevzi
    Song, Zibin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 91
  • [33] Citizen Engagement and Open Government Co-creation: The Cases of Brazil and the Dominican Republic
    Khutkyy, Dmytro
    TOGETHER IN THE UNSTABLE WORLD: DIGITAL GOVERNMENT AND SOLIDARITY, 2023, : 199 - 204
  • [34] Client-service engagement in social service provision as co-creation of value
    Nicholas, Graeme
    Taueetia-Su'a, Tua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2017, 17
  • [35] Promoting active citizen engagement in sustainable energy transitions: a co-creation approach
    Rowan, W.
    McCarthy, S.
    Mebrahtu, S.
    Ertio, Titiana
    Dimova, Adriana
    Asenova, Desislava
    Moraitis, Nektarios
    Revez, Alexandra
    JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2024,
  • [36] Barriers and enablers to stakeholder engagement in the co-creation of disaster risk reduction solutions
    Abderhalden, Jogscha M.
    Scolobig, Anna
    Stoffel, Markus
    Lachmann, Jo-Ting Huang
    Calvello, Michele
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2025, 120
  • [37] Enabling incentivization and citizen engagement in the smart-city co-creation paradigm
    Choque, Johnny
    Medela, Arturo
    Echevarria, Juan
    Diez, Luis
    Munoz, Luis
    2018 GLOBAL INTERNET OF THINGS SUMMIT (GIOTS), 2018, : 265 - 270
  • [38] The role of staff engagement in facilitating staff-led value co-creation
    Merrilees, Bill
    Miller, Dale
    Yakimova, Raisa
    JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 28 (02) : 250 - 264
  • [39] Co-Creation Facilitates Translational Research on Upper Limb Prosthetics
    Jones, Hannah
    Dupan, Sigrid
    Coutinho, Maxford
    Day, Sarah
    Desmond, Deirdre
    Donovan-Hall, Margaret
    Dyson, Matthew
    Ekins-Coward, Thea
    Kenney, Laurence
    Krasoulis, Agamemnon
    McIntosh, Doug
    Memarzadeh, Kaveh
    Small, Edward
    Wheeler, Gemma
    Wu, Hancong
    Nazarpour, Kianoush
    PROSTHESIS, 2021, 3 (02): : 110 - 118
  • [40] The Research and Co-creation Model for Urban Interaction Design and Practices
    Zhou, Yuyao
    Jiang, Nan
    CROSS-CULTURAL DESIGN: APPLICATIONS IN CULTURAL HERITAGE, CREATIVITY AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, CCD 2018, 2018, 10912 : 444 - 454